iRubric: Robotic Engineering Final Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Robotic Engineering Final Project

Robotic Engineering - Sumo

This rubric is designed to assess the design of the individual's robot including programming and execution.

Rubric Code: R25WB53

By nmaksim_PCSC

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Engineering

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Robotic Engineering Final Project
	Attempted 4 pts	Acceptable 6 pts	Admirable 8 pts	Amazing 10 pts
Basic Structure and build	Attempted Robot base design is incomplete, attachments are not intact and falling apart.	Acceptable Robot assembly done with 5 to 10 errors. Robot base structure has some stability but weak. Attachments difficult to apply; and /or not modular; not precise.	Admirable Robot assembly is done with 5 or less errors. Robot base is stable, but not robust. Attachments function most of the time.	Amazing Robot assembles is complete with no errors. Robot base stable and robust Attachments modular, function as expected. Attachments perform tasks extremely well and are repeatable.
Originallity	Attempted Robot copied from other designs and not modified by individual	Acceptable Robot show signs of individual's design ideas.	Admirable Robot designed by individual	Amazing Robot designed by individual design is unique and creative.
Operation	Attempted Robot did not perform at all.	Acceptable Your robot did something, but did not perform well in fights that it was supposed to.	Admirable Completes 3 rounds of intended function without breaks most of the time.	Amazing Completes 3 rounds of function without breaks. Adjusts speed and position sensing for optimum speed and accuracy. Turns accurately and consistently.
Program	Attempted Programs inefficient. Results unpredictable Sensors inadequately used. Programs do not accomplish expected tasks. Variables, loops, subroutines and conditions defined but unused.	Acceptable Programs efficient at completing some tasks. Programs do some of what is expected. Variables, loops, subroutines and conditions, if used, not understood.	Admirable Programs efficient at Programs do what they're expected to do. Sensors used effectively, if used. Variables, loops, subroutines and conditions, if used, are needed. Student can describe most of program and its effects.	Amazing Programs logically organized. Programs very efficient. Programs always work, even for complex tasks. Sensors, if used, guarantee certain actions in every trial. Variables, loops, subroutines and conditions, if used, are effective. Students can describe how the program is functioned and coded.
Presentation	Attempted Little knowledge of why some parts are located as they are on the robot. Little or no understanding of what pieces did. Building/programming appears primarily done by instructor. Seldom cooperated with other. Hardly did any work on the robot themselves. Rarely offered useful ideas.	Acceptable Knowledge of robot structure and programming shows minimal understanding of underlying design, science, and technology. Building and programming seems primarily directed by instructor. Sometimes cooperated with the others Could have done more. Sometimes offered useful ideas.	Admirable Knowledge of robot structure and programming shows moderate understanding of underlying design, science, and technology. Building/programming mostly directed by individual/team members, with help from instructor. Cooperative with the others. Did their part of the work. Usually offered useful ideas.	Amazing Knowledge of robot structure and programming shows thorough understanding of underlying design, science, and technology. Building/programming was done by individual. Always willing to help and do more. Did their share and helped others to complete. Routinely offered useful ideas.
Troubleshooting	Attempted None	Acceptable Recognizes, attempts with little or no success.	Admirable Can perform troubleshooting most of the time. Moderate success getting robot to achieve attempted objectives.	Amazing Always performs troubleshooting without being asked. Works on robotic design, programming and features until objectives are achieved.
Leadership	Attempted None; detracts from unity and excellence.	Acceptable Very little. Is cooperative and offers some ideas in group settings.	Admirable Can be a good leader. Is cooperative and occasionally helps others in group setting.	Amazing Excellent leader. Clearly leads team and in group settings with all aspects of robot construction, programming and achievement of objectives. Neutralizes disagreements and compromises.
Resources	Attempted Does not use resources even though available	Acceptable Usually reads and uses general and basic resources available.	Admirable Reads and uses general resources. Will seek outside resources and information when prompted or provided.	Amazing Almost always seeks outside resources. Books, internet sites/searches, other software are consulted frequently.
Redesign	Attempted Cannot identify issues. Does not attempt redesign to improve result	Acceptable Identifies some issues with performance. Attempts limited redesign which does not improve performance	Admirable Identifies issues with performance. Attempts redesign which improves performance to a small degree	Amazing Identifies multiple issues with redesign. Redesigns robot improving performance in specific areas
CAD	Attempted No Blueprint or prototypes or measurement of the design provided	Acceptable Provided Standard prototype picture with some annotation and measurement.	Admirable Provided Standard Engineering blueprint of the design with some measurement and some ability to reproduce or recreate the design	Amazing Provided Standard Engineering blueprint of the design with complete measurement and ability to manufacture the design.

Keywords:

Mechatronics

Subjects:

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric