iRubric: Panel Discussion The Great Gatsby rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Panel Discussion The Great Gatsby

In conjunction with deliberation directives, organized, intellectual panel discussions explore four varying morals per The Great Gatsby

Rubric Code: R25W37X

By Irubric2229

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

DISCUSSION PANEL
	Level 4 EXCEPTIONAL (N/A)	Level 3 SKILLED (N/A)	Level 2 DEVELOPING (N/A)	Level 1 INADEQUATE (N/A)
CRITICAL THINKING	Level 4 Panel discussion members present facets of directives with indefatigable scholarly coherence and clarity. All panel discussion members present with complete confidence, speaking with authority. All panel discussion members speak eloquently, acknowledging a compelling understanding of content material. All panel discussion members remain focused.	Level 3 Panel discussion members present facets of directives with coherence and clarity. All panel discussion members present, speaking with varying authority. All panel discussion members speak, acknowledging an understanding of content material.	Level 2 Panel discussion members present facets of directives with limited coherence and clarity. All panel discussion members speak with inconsistent authority. All panel discussion members speak with a limited understanding of content material.	Level 1 Panel discussion members present facets of directives, but the information is ambiguous, lacking coherence and clarity. Panel discussion members' knowledge base is vague and unfocused.
PRESENTATION/APPLICATION	Level 4 Panel discussion members apply pertinent, detailed support from sources that adds significantly and exhaustively to presentation.	Level 3 Panel discussion members apply pertinent, detailed support from sources that adds significantly to presentation.	Level 2 Panel discussion members apply some pertinent, detailed support from sources; however, support is somewhat ambiguous.	Level 1 Panel discussion members do not apply any pertinent, detailed support from sources.
GROUP ENTERPRISE	Level 4 Panel discussion members exhibit exemplary collaboration, noted in noteworthy evidence and efficient transitions. All panel discussion members not only collaborate but diligently invest themselves in the delivery, through visible preparedness, through mutual respect, and through acknowledging how to lead. The panel discussion was: - clearly developed, polished and rehearsed - exceedingly interesting -audience was attentive due to credible rhetoric	Level 3 Panel discussion members exhibit significant collaboration, noted in noteworthy evidence and transitions. All panel discussion members collaborate and invest themselves in the delivery through visible preparedness and mutual respect. The panel discussion was: - clearly developed - interesting -audience was attentive due to apt rhetoric	Level 2 Panel discussion members exhibit a lack of collaboration, noted in evidence and transitions. The panel discussion was: - clearly not developed - insubstantial -audience found it difficult to be attentive	Level 1 Panel discussion members exhibit no collaboration. The panel discussion was: - ambiguous - insubstantial -audience could not sustain focus
GRADE DEMARCATIONS	Level 4 33.3/100 = 33.3 4.5 33.3/95 = 32 4.0 33.3/90 = 30 3.5 Each category is separately assessed. Total Points: 100 CT ______________ P/A______________ GE______________ EC______________	Level 3 33.3/85 = 28 3 33.3/80 = 27 2.5 Each category is separately assessed. Total Points: 100 CT ______________ P/A______________ GE______________ EC______________	Level 2 33.3/75 = 25 2 33.3/70 = 23 1.5 Each category is separately assessed. Total Points: 100 CT ______________ P/A______________ GE______________ EC______________	Level 1 33.3/65 = 22 1 33.3/60 = 20 .5 Each category is separately assessed. Total Points: 100 CT ______________ P/A______________ GE______________ EC______________

Keywords:

Panel Discussion

Subjects:

English

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric