Skip to main content
iRubric: Heather Coy Fall 2022 Participation Rubric

iRubric: Heather Coy Fall 2022 Participation Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Heather Coy Fall 2022 Participation Rubric 
Class participation is based on several important ideas: 1. We construct knowledge and learn from each other, and if you don't speak, others don't learn from you--and vice versa; 2. The evaluation of your performance is based on evidence, what can be demonstrated and observed-- you need to show what you know; 3. The more noticeable you make yourself by your participation, the more memorable you are to others when they are trying to recall who you are and what you stand for.
Rubric Code: R237334
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Participation
  Poor = D

D: Set; Cannot be changed.

1 pts

Fair = C

C: Set; Cannot be changed.

2 pts

Good = B

B: Set; Cannot be changed.

3 pts

A Game

A: Create criteria for your A game

4 pts

Evidence

At the end of the semester provide evidence to support your score for each category.

(N/A)

Class Attendance
20 %

Grade I deserve: A

Poor = D

Missed 3 or more classes
Fair = C

Missed 2 or more classes
Good = B

Missed 1 or more classes
A Game

Missed 0 classes!
Evidence

I have not missed any classes the whole semester (at worst, was 5 minutes late).
Frequency of Participation
15 %

Grade I deserve: A

Poor = D

does not contribute or alternately dominates discussion
Fair = C

Irregularly participates, ONLY OCCASIONALLY
Good = B

initiates questions and comments, regularly participates.
A Game

Consistently participates in each discussion, every class with substantial commentary and/or questions.
Evidence

I was one of the few students in class that would consistently, actively participate every single class period! I always involved myself in dialogue every chance I could, ensuring that dialogue would occur even during class when participation was even less than normal.
Forum/Perusall Participation
20 %

Grade I deserve: A

Poor = D

1-2 Annotations Posted readings, personal experiences, news items, videos, articles, observations, etc.
Fair = C

3-4- Annotations. readings, personal experiences, news items, videos, articles, observations, etc.
Good = B

5-6 annotations, posted personal experiences, news items, videos, articles, observations, etc.
A Game

7+ annotations/personal anecdotes/news items/videos/articles/observations etc.
Evidence

Though there were some technical difficulties on occasion with perusall, I always completed readings and annotations before our class period. They were also substantial responses (and several submitted) that put forward my own interpretations, analyzation, opinion, or connections I made on whatever article or video we were assigned. I also reacted to and interacted with my classmates in these discussions.
Team Participation out/in class
10 %

Grade I deserve: A

Poor = D

Never met with group
Fair = C

Met with group occasionally and occasionally offered input to group discussion.
Good = B

Present for most group meetings and always contributed to discussion.
A Game

Present for all group meetings and actively provided input and strong contribution to discussion/team's work.
Evidence

Befriended my teammates and ensured a positive and collaborative environment both inside and outside the classroom. One of the main leaders when we presented our projects to discuss with the class through my public speaking and contribution to slide/activity making.
Outside Of Class Participation
5 %

Grade I deserve: B

Poor = D

Never participated in announced outside activities (films, lectures, relevant volunteer work,etc) outside of class time.
Fair = C

Occasionally participated in announced outside activities (films, lectures, relevant volunteer work,etc) outside of class time.
Good = B

Frequently participated in announced outside activities (films, lectures, relevant volunteer work,etc) outside of class time.
A Game

Always participated in announced outside activities (films, lectures, relevant volunteer work,etc) outside of class time.
Evidence

Frequently watched the films and did readings outside of class time and contributed to the discussions of these works we were asked to see on our own time. There was only one occasion where I was not able to participate in watching an assigned movie outside of class.
Questioning
5 %

Grade I deserve: A

Poor = D

Makes only statements, "(this is what you should do and how" Does not ask questions.
Fair = C

Asks some questions but makes mostly statements, or leading questions. Already has an answer before asking a question.
Good = B

Asks open ended questions.
When statements are made they are mostly in response to a question. When beginning to make a statement, tries to re-frame the statement into a question.
A Game

When statements are made they are entirely in response to a question while also asking open ended questions.
Evidence

Through my preparation and participation, I demonstrated my ability to respond thoroughly to questions raised in class as well as ask proper questions to further class engagement.
Authenticity
5 %

Grade I deserve: A

Poor = D

Makes statement or asks questions only based on what others want to hear. Relates to others as they want and not as self.
Fair = C

Takes into consideration self (feelings, thoughts, opinions, etc,) but continues to only give feedback that conforms to the other.
Good = B

Is beginning to be self-authoring, appearing to others as one appears to oneself.
A Game

Is entirely self-authoring; can comprehend/appeal to the perspectives of both myself and of fellow classmates.
Evidence

In all our discussions I was both open minded to my perspective or stance on an issue being altered, while being readily prepared enough to protect my positions that I found most right. Did not matter if I was in the minority or the majority for a topic, I just expressed my thoughts freely.
Preparation
5 %

Grade I deserve: A

Poor = D

makes spontaneous but uninformed comments, obvious that required pre-reading not completed.
Fair = C

Comments are informed but lack completeness of comprehensive preparation
Good = B

has read assigned material and relates comments to it
A Game

Has thoroughly read/annotated assignments and has full ability to participate in class.
Evidence

This can be seen through my level of participation both inside and outside the classroom as well as through my questioning and thorough completion of the Perusall assignments. I came to class every day ready to engage and discuss in depth, which would not have been possible if not for my level of preparation that would be done in the days leading up to class every week.
Originality/creativity
5 %

Grade I deserve: A

Poor = D

restatement of readings or comments already offered
Fair = C

Unconventional ideas but may not be well thought out or practical
Good = B

presents novel view, different perspective, original approaches
A Game

Is able to present both diversified views and original approaches/input.
Evidence

Able to view certain topics in a different light than many of the rest of my class due to where I am from (NY) and my ethnicity. I could both relate to my peers on a topic as well as provide a new avenue of thought regarding experiences in my/ my families lives that they would never have considered on issues.
Articulation
2 %

Grade I deserve: A

Poor = D

mispronunciation, poor use of words, poorly organized ideas
Fair = C

Uses jargon, common expressions rather than appropriate technical terms
Good = B

clear and organized use of language, expresses ideas fluently, visual supplements
A Game

Concise use of language and connections with the assigned work, along with the incorporation of relevant visual/auditory references (i.e. videos seen).
Evidence

As I participated in classroom discussion, I would always ensure to support or base my points on the assignments completed for that days topic in particular, or connect it back to any of the previous references we have gained throughout the semester.
Presentation
2 %

Grade I deserve: A

Poor = D

Speaks too softly for all to hear, addreses only the instructor, monotone, upspeak
Fair = C

Inconsistent in presentation, needs reminding,variable style, mannerisms
Good = B

eye contact, address all of class, audible volume, interest & inflection in voice
A Game

Eye contact, takes initiative in leading components of the discussion; no need for notes; directly interacting with audience.
Evidence

Throughout every presentation I have always lead the classroom with positive and direct discussion with knowledge recalled on my own, maintaining eye contact, and projecting through a clear and concise voice. I have also ensured to engage the audience via questions to see their perspectives or through games like jeopardy or kahoot for them to gain a stimulating involvement in the presentation.
Vocabulary
2 %

Grade I deserve: A

Poor = D

Uses cliche's, mundane vocabulary, uses terms incorrectly
Fair = C

Inconsistent in use of proper terms
Good = B

demonstrates knowledge and accurate use of terms
A Game

Excels in knowledge and articulate use of language when expressing thoughts.
Evidence

Through my preparation and participation I am able to excel with my use of vocabulary that is relevant and articulate to the topics at hand such as terms learned surrounding science, environment and/or political policy.
Receptive
2 %

Grade I deserve: A

Poor = D

defensive, demeans others' comments, talks over them, or disregards feedback
Fair = C

Is respectful and listens, but does not apply feedback
Good = B

accurately listens to and considers feedback from others
A Game

Openly listens and takes feedback from others/applies it.
Evidence

Always an open and active listener to both the teacher and my peers, ready and willing to receive feedback and learn something from others.
Inclusion
2 %

Grade I deserve: A

Poor = D

does not mention others or further develop ideas previously discussed
Fair = C

Implies contributions of others and bases argument on previous contributions
Good = B

builds on and relates to points made by other contributors,, harmonizes, summarizes, contrasts etc. When referring to others, uses their name.
A Game

Creates an environment where open communication can be had through friendly and professional discussions with peers; Adequate contribution and use of names as well.
Evidence

Always brought forward a high energy and positive, fun energy to the classroom and helped raise spirits through friendly and educational conversations. The class was often quite due to the early hour start but I ensured all felt comfortable around me and in talking to me. If name tags were up I would use their names as well.
Rhetoric
2 %

Grade I deserve: B

Poor = D

argues opinion or emotion without evidence
Fair = C

Provides weak or inconsistent evidence or reasoning
Good = B

gives evidence supporting assertions, argues logically, gives examples
A Game

excels in providing strong claims/stances with supportive, factual evidence and real life examples relevant to class.
Evidence

Always gave relevant and rational arguments with coinciding evidence/examples to back my statements whenever I engaged in any discussions whether it was through Perusall or in person during class.
Relevance & value
2 %

Grade I deserve: A

Poor = D

tangential or pedantic
Fair = C

Contributes on portions or segments, but misses the big picture
Good = B

comments are pertinent to topic and add important facts and perspectives
A Game

Is able to consistently see the big pictures of topics and contribute thoughtful commentary that adds further to the conversation.
Evidence

Always furthered conversation in class by being one of the few interactive students on a daily basis and was able to connect the topics and assignments we had to others from prior, as well as to what we as people have always known to be true in society and view things from a broader lens along with a narrower one when necessary.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98