Skip to main content

iRubric: Rad Tech WKLY Eval w/o points rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Rad Tech WKLY Eval w/o points 
Rad Tech WKLY Eval w/o points
Rubric Code: QXW3276
By kingerdog
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric
  NOT THERE YET

(N/A)

PROGRESSING

(N/A)

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

(N/A)

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

(N/A)

1. COMMUNICATION

Demonstrates appropriate pt. communication prior to & during exam.
Communicates with HC personnel in regards to patient needs/task completion.
NOT THERE YET

Student is inconsistent at initiating communication with patient before, during & after exam. Doesn’t recognize need to communicate impertinent information to HC personnel.
PROGRESSING

Demonstrates initiative to communicate with patient but needs remedial intervention to assure appropriate level of communication. Supervising intervention to complete exam.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Demonstrates good communication skills with patients and healthcare team with minimal reminders for successful exam completion.
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Consistently demonstrates proficiency with all aspects of communication with pt. and/or healthcare team; No intervention needed.
2. PT. CARE/SAFETY

Properly I.D’s pt. & is able to assess patient needs/abilities. Interprets order demonstrating knowledge of exam requirements.
Infection control/standards precautions are followed.
NOT THERE YET

Needs complete intervention (inconsistent) with patient identification and not able to determine patient’s needs/abilities. Does not demonstrate ability to interpret order for exam requirements. Did not follow infection control/standard precautions requiring supervisory intervention.
PROGRESSING

Needs some reminders on proper patient i.d. and/or patient assessment.
Able to determine some exam protocol based on pt. assessment but not w/o intervention for exam initiation. Needed few reminders regarding infection control/standard precautions.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Demonstrates ability to properly i.d patients and assess patient needs with few reminders. Determines appropriate exam protocol/variations needed for majority of exams. Follows infection control/standard precautions.
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Consistently follows pt. i.d. protocol and is able to initiate proper exam protocol based on patient needs/variations.
Demonstrates proficiency in infection control measures and standard precautions with exams performed with no reminders.
3.EXAM PEFORMANCE

Demonstrates knowledge of exam specifics that affect exam outcome; SID, positioning, CR, equipment use/manipulation, technical factors & anatomical i.d. (marker)
*overall systematic approach for exam requirements.
NOT THERE YET

Not able to initiate and complete exams (inconsistent) without supervisory intervention. Student needs constant assistance completing even the basics for exam completions.
PROGRESSING

Able to initiate exams but requires intervention to successfully complete exam; (unable to follow through with all projections and criteria). Student needs assistance in most, but not all basic exam protocols for exam completion.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Demonstrates proficiency in initiating and completing majority of exams with only a few reminders on exam specifics. Has the main concept of exam systematics down.
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

The student was able to work independently with majority of routine exams performed with little or no reminders throughout.
Consistently demonstrates proficiency with exams performed.
4. RADIATION SAFETY

All supervision policies adhered to. Follows ALARA principles; adequate collimation, appropriate shielding, pregnancy inquiry.
NOT THERE YET

Student lacks knowledge of ALARA principles and therefore required constant reminders; (shielding, inquiring about chance of pregnancy). Radiation safety would be a concern without supervisory intervention; AND/OR Student did not adhere to the policies of supervision.
*Requires CI reporting.
PROGRESSING

Student demonstrate some understanding of ALARA concepts but needs numerous reminders; (shielding, inquiring about pregnancy) Knowledge of importance of collimation is demonstrated.
Student required reminders on direct/indirect supervision.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Student demonstrates knowledge of ALARA principles with only a few reminders with shielding or pregnancy inquiry. Proper collimation is demonstrated with minimal corrections. No reminders regarding supervision required.
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Student consistently demonstrates all aspects of ALARA with no reminders and only minimal adjustments.
No reminders regarding supervision were required.
5. IMAGE EVALUATION

Demonstrates knowledge of required image criteria; anatomy, positioning, proper identifiers (markers), exposure # consistently throughout evaluation period.
*Those exams the student is claiming.
NOT THERE YET

Student does not demonstrate knowledge of basic image criteria and needs complete intervention for determining exam quality. *Student was unable to take ownership of assuring optimum images with the majority of exams performed.
PROGRESSING

Student demonstrates some knowledge of basic image criteria but requires numerous reminders; doesn’t show consistency with specifics (anatomy, positioning, markers, exposure #’s)Required intervention to assure all quality factors.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Student is able to evaluate images of majority of exams performed in regards to required criteria with occasional reminders; demonstrating progression in proficiency with image evaluation.
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Student demonstrates proficiency at evaluating routine images for exams performed. Little or no supervisory intervention required demonstrating knowledge of critical image criteria.
6. INDEPEND. JUDG/CRIT.THINKING

Demonstrates ability to determine deviations from routine when applicable.
Demonstrates ability to determine corrective action if repeat is needed.
NOT THERE YET

Student was not able to complete majority of exams that were outside the scope of routine. Student needed excessive intervention in determining the need for repeats and therefore not able to determine exam completion.
PROGRESSING

Student required intervention for most exams that deviated from routine. Needed constant reminders in determining corrective action when repeats were needed.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Student requires only a few reminders for exam completions when protocol deviates from routine. Student was able to state required corrective action for most exams completed. *Demonstrates independent judgment for most exams.
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Student demonstrates consistency in acknowledging adjustments needed for majority of exams completed. Student is able to determine the need for repeats and determine corrective action required with minimal or no reminders. Student demonstrates proficiency at utilizing independent judgment while performing exams.
7. INITIATIVE/SELF MOTIVATION

Initiates exams & demonstrates ability to contribute to department workflow; (performs or participates w/o constant guidance.
NOT THERE YET

Student lacks initiative when exam opportunities exist. Student is not self-motivated requiring constant reminders to pursue exam initiation. Does not demonstrate the initiative to contribute to department workflow.
PROGRESSING

Student needs reminders to pursue exam opportunities but demonstrates motivation when prompted.
(Student is a good helper when asked, contributing to dept. workflow but doesn’t demonstrate self-direction).
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Student shows initiative and self-motivation with minimal reminders; demonstrating progression in self-direction. Contributes to department workflow with minimal prompts to do so.
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Student is self-motivated; initiates exams and requires little or no reminders. Greatly contributes to department workflow without being prompted to do so.
8. PROFESSIONALISM & ETHICS

Shows respect & responsibility with constructive feedback. Demonstrates adherence to HIPAA requirements.
Overall exhibits behaviors that contribute to a professional environment.
NOT THERE YET

The student does not demonstrate the ability to act professionally when receiving constructive feedback and needs intervention.
The student lacks knowledge of HIPAA requirements and requires supervisory intervention.
*Requires CI reporting.
PROGRESSING

The student responds professionaly to feedback but needs supervisory intervention at maintaining a professional demeanor in the work setting. Student demonstrates awareness of HIPAA requirements but needs numerous reminders; *Requires CI intervention.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

The student demonstrates professionalism & responsibly accepts constructive feedback.
The student adheres to HIPAA requirements.
Student is showing growth in professionalism requiring only minimal guidance.
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

The student requires no intervention with professional behavior and therefore contributes to a professional work environment. Demonstrates consistency with knowledge of HIPAA guidelines.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243