Skip to main content
iRubric: Robot Dragster Design rubric

iRubric: Robot Dragster Design rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Robot Dragster Design 
This EV3 color sensor rubric is designed to assess the design and operation of the team's Color-activated Robot Dragster.
Rubric Code: QXB9989
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Robot Design Rubric
  Needs Improvement

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Total Points

(N/A)

Innovative Design
10 pts

Design is unique and strays from the base bot design in many ways

Needs Improvement

Design, drive train, and structure are standard.

Sensors do not work properly.

Does not use the use of a gear train.
Fair

Design creative, unique use of drive train or structure

Unique/creative strategy for coordinating missions.

Sensors work sometimes.

Uses simple gear train.
Good

Design creative, unique use of drive train or structure.

Manipulators/sensors used in unexpected ways, if used.

Sensors work as intended.

Multi-gear train used with idler
Excellent

Design creative, unique use of drive train or structure and sensors.

Programming tasks used in unexpected ways.

Manipulators/sensors used in unexpected ways, if used.
Unique design and use of gear train
Total Points
Strategy, Process, Problem-Solving
5 pts

There is an engineering design template explaining THE WHY???

Needs Improvement

Uses standard design.

No design process (from initial concept through build, test, refinement) communicated.
Fair

Some forethought in initial design.

Refinement of robot and programs not communicated.
Good

Basic understanding of design process, evidence of conceptual planning, building, testing, refining of robot, manipulators, programs.
Excellent

Communicates complete design process, from initial concept through build, test, and refinement.
Total Points
Locomotion & Navigation
10 pts

Must use gears & travel in it's designated lane the entire distance

Needs Improvement

Difficulty going same distance on repeated missions.

Drives inaccurate or inconsistent.
Fair

Goes defined distances sometimes.

Drives sometimes accurate

Sensors do not perform correctly.
Good

Drives reasonably accurate and consistent.

Allows for variables.

May use various sensors.

Sensors perform as expected and correctly.
Excellent

Goes defined distances efficiently.

Drives accurately and consistently.

Allows for variables (battery wear, obstacles).

Sensors perform as expected and correctly in a unique way.
Total Points
Programming
15 pts

Color-Sensor activated. Starts on Green/Stops on Red. Sound & images

Needs Improvement

Programs disorganized

Programs inefficient

Results unpredictable
Fair

Programs somewhat organized

Programs do some of what is expected
Good

Programs organized.

Programs do what they're expected to do.
Excellent

Programs logically organized.

Programs very efficient & consistent.
Total Points
Teamwork
20 pts

All members can explain the reasoning of the design, build & coding

Needs Improvement

Little knowledge of teamwork

Design, building/programming appears to be primarily done by one member
Fair

Team knowledge of robot structure design, build and programming is limited
Good

Knowledge of robot structure and programming

The entire team shows understanding of design

Building/programming mostly directed by team members
Excellent

The entire team has understanding of design, science, and technology

Building/programming was done by team members.
Total Points
Structural
20 pts

Robot is sturdy and does not fall apart when shook. Minimum 11" long

Needs Improvement

Difficulty with robot assembly during demo.

Base weak, falls apart when handled or run.

Gears do not work as intended
Fair

Robot assembly done with few errors.

Robot base structure has some stability.

Robot show signs of team's design ideas.

Gears work on occasion, but inefficiently
Good

Slow robot assembly, with no errors

Robot base stable, but not robust.

Robot designed by team.

Gears work as intended
Excellent

Robot assembles easily.

Robot is stable and robust. Does not fall apart when picked up

Robot designed by team; design is unique and creative.

Gears work efficiently and properly
Total Points
Overall Design
20 pts

Everything works together and there is a nice flow to the design

Needs Improvement

Robot lacks most critical design components:

Few components work together; few components look like they belong together.
Fair

Robot lacks many critical design components: works, stays together, efficient parts use, attachments
Good

Robot lacks some critical design components: efficient parts use attachments easy to add/remove

Most components work together
Excellent

Robot is elegant, complete system.

All components work well together.

All components look like they belong together.
Total Points



Keywords:
  • Robot Design


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98