iRubric: Interview with Child Development Theorists rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Interview with Child Development Theorists

Interview with Theorists

Rubric Code: QX3AB6

By shenantl

Draft

Private Rubric

Subject: Psychology

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Interview with Theorists
	Limited Development (N/A)	Satisfactory Development (N/A)	Very Well Developed (N/A)
Background Information	Limited Development Little or no background information about a particular theorists was included	Satisfactory Development Sufficient background information about a particular theorists was included	Very Well Developed Detailed background information about a particular theorists was included
Basic Assumptions	Limited Development Basic assumptions are not clear and not very well explained; key concepts are not defined and developed	Satisfactory Development Basic assumptions were discussed and explained; key concepts are provided, but with limited development	Very Well Developed Basic assumptions are clear and very well explained; key concepts are defined and developed with examples
Strengths & Insights	Limited Development Strengths and insights for awareness of student's learning needs were vaguely discussed and explained with little to no support or examples	Satisfactory Development Strengths of approach were generally described with limited support; and two or more insights for awareness of student's learning needs were mostly discussed and explained	Very Well Developed Strengths of approach were specifically described and supported; and two or more insights for awareness of student's learning needs are clear, exemplified and relevant
Criticisms/Limitations	Limited Development Very little or no criticisms/limitations were presented	Satisfactory Development Criticisms/limitations were presented with limited development	Very Well Developed Criticisms/limitations were debated, explained, or presented clearly
Formating & Style Requirements	Limited Development The outline length/ format and/or reference requirements were not followed and fell short of the minimum number; and/or excessive wordiness makes it difficult to understand	Satisfactory Development The outline length/ format and/or reference requirements were not completely followed; and mostly clearly written	Very Well Developed The outline length/ format and reference requirements were followed; and clearly written
Overall Organization	Limited Development Structure is not clear, introduction and conclusion is not relevant to focus in outline or is missing; sections are disjointed and lack transitions in many areas	Satisfactory Development Structure is mostly clear, includes sufficiently developed and relevant introduction and conclusion; sections are mostly logical and maintain flow of key points throughout	Very Well Developed Structure is clear, includes well developed and relevant introduction and conclusion; sections are logical and maintain flow of topics and key points throughout

Subjects:

Psychology

Types:

Discuss this rubric