iRubric: Rubric: French Video Project

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Rubric: French Video Project

This rubric is designed for a French video presentation performance assessment in which the students will be presenting vocabulary and grammar concepts from the entire year. Students are being graded both individually and as a group. The skit must be videotaped in French, with subtitles in English, and uploaded on the website tcafrenchfilm.tk

Rubric Code: QX27724

By jsusini

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Foreign Languages

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Performance Rubric
	Poor 1-2 (N/A)	Fair 3-5 (N/A)	Good 6-8 (N/A)	Excellent 9-10 (N/A)
1. Pronunciation	Poor 1-2 Student pronounced 7 or more words incorrectly, with little effort for correction.	Fair 3-5 Student pronounced 5-6 words incorrectly, with some effort for correction.	Good 6-8 Student pronounced 3-4 words incorrectly, with some effort for correction.	Excellent 9-10 Student pronounced 0-2 words incorrectly, with great effort for correction.
2. Use of vocabulary words.	Poor 1-2 Students did not use level appropriate words throughout the skit.	Fair 3-5 Students used a minimum of vocabulary words throughout the skit.	Good 6-8 Students used some level appropriate vocabulary throughout the skit.	Excellent 9-10 Students used level appropriate vocabulary words throughout the skit.
3. Grammar	Poor 1-2 Student had 8 or more grammar points used incorrectly throughout the skit, with little effort for correction.	Fair 3-5 Student had 6-7 grammar points used incorrectly throughout the skit, with little or some effort for correction.	Good 6-8 Student had 4- 5 grammar points used incorrectly throughout the skit, with some effort for correction.	Excellent 9-10 Students had less than 3 grammar points used incorrectly throughout the skit, with great effort for correction.
4. Fluency	Poor 1-2 Student presented a below average demonstration of French fluency. Student stumbled over words and missed or confused lines multiple times. Student's use of note-cards for lines was obvious. It appeared student did not understand what he/she was saying.	Fair 3-5 Student presented an average demonstration of French fluency. Student stumbled over words and missed or confused lines more than 3 times. Student had to use note-cards for lines often. Student's intonation/expression was often inappropriate.	Good 6-8 Student presented an average demonstration of French fluency. Student stumbled over words at times and confused lines two or less times. Student had to use note cards for lines often. Student's intonation indicating an understanding of what he/she was saying.	Excellent 9-10 Student presented an average to above average performance. Student had few to no issues with fluency.
5. Props	Poor 1-2 Students used 0-1 props in their skit and/or props did not contribute to the performance.	Fair 3-5 Students used 2 props and most contributed to the understanding of the performance.	Good 6-8 Students used 3-4 props and most contributed to the understanding of the performance.	Excellent 9-10 Students used 5 or more props and all contributed to the performance making the skit very entertaining!
6. Effort and Attitude	Poor 1-2 The student put little to no effort into the skit and the group grade suffered because of attitude.	Fair 3-5 The student could have done more to contribute and/or was not showing enthusiasm in front of the class.	Good 6-8 The student could have done more to contribute and/or, however was showing enthusiasm in front of the class.	Excellent 9-10 The student was excited and ready to present with a smile! The group benefited from this member!
7. Creativity	Poor 1-2 The students presented little creativity in their skit.Students worked together poorly, video was late, preparation was unorganized, and/or took away from the overall quality of the work	Fair 3-5 The student's presentation was a little creative, room for improvement. Students worked together , video was on time, preparation was unorganized, and/or took away from the overall quality of the work	Good 6-8 The student's presentation was creative and unique, however had room for improvement. Students worked together with little or no problems, video was on time, and/or organization was lacking but acceptable.	Excellent 9-10 The student's work was very creative and unique!
8. Participation	Poor 1-2 Did not work well within his/her group, and did not bring ideas to their group.	Fair 3-5 Not all group member's participated according to the task.	Good 6-8 All group member's fully participated, however, there's room for improvement.	Excellent 9-10 All group member's fully participated and brought ideas to their group.
9. Subtitles	Poor 1-2 Subtitles were inaccurate more than accurate. English speakers would not know what the video was really about.	Fair 3-5 Competent subtitles provided. Translations were at times word-for-word and they did not always convey the essence. Several inaccuracies occurred.	Good 6-8 Effective subtitles provided. Translations were not word-for-word, and they conveyed the essence although a few inaccuracies occurred.	Excellent 9-10 Thorough and accurate subtitles provided. Translations were not literally word-for-word and the essence was conveyed.
10. Script	Poor 1-2 No Script	Fair 3-5 Script was incomplete and evidenced minimal effort.	Good 6-8 Script was almost complete, but missing some critical elements. Evidence of concerted effort.	Excellent 9-10 Complete script with all dialogue and vocabulary well written with minimal errors.

Subjects:

Foreign Languages

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric