iRubric: Annie Dookhan Trial rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Annie Dookhan Trial

A chemist accused of lying about drug samples she tested at a state lab could face additional charges as prosecutors and defense attorneys sift through thousands of criminal cases

Rubric Code: Q946X7

By hstoddard

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Engineering

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Court Case Proejct
	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Duties, Functions, and Roles	Poor There is not sufficient information to understand what this job entails.The duties are listed but insufficient to understand the role in the case. Multiple errors.2 details - stated, but not well developed. Multiple spelling and/or grammar errors. Minimum MyAccess score of 65%.	Fair Students describe the responsibilities and function of the selected role in the case in basic terms with few errors. 2 details -but well developed. More than 3 spelling and/or grammar errors. Minimum MyAccess score of 70%.	Good Student should make sure responsibilties are described and examples are given but minor sentence structure issues. 3 details - stated, but not well developed. No more than 3 spelling and/or grammar errors. Achieves a MyAccess score of 85%.	Excellent Student should describe the Responsibilities of the selected jobs in detail.Very well developed essay. Contains accurate and complete information of the job description. It engages the reader and creates interest. Minimum of 3 details -well developed with 0 spelling and grammar errors. Achieves MyAccess score of >95%.
Research	Poor No research was done and none of the required information was included on the assignment. No documentation provided.	Fair Very little research was done and very little required information was included on assignment as demonstrated through documentation (i.e. journal, bibliography, organized presentation of notes)	Good Partial research was done and only partial required information was included on assignment as demonstrated through documentation (i.e. journal, bibliography, organized presentation of notes)	Excellent Extensive research was done and ALL required information was included on assignment as demonstrated through documentation (i.e. journal, bibliography, organized presentation of notes)
Performance	Poor Completes 2 of the 5 requirements.Work product lacking detail or neatness.Craftsmanship is secondary to getting the job done quickly.Work products below teacher's expectations .	Fair Completes 3 of the 5 requirements.Work products below teacher's expectations.Improves workmanship with prompting. Procrastinates and Delivers product prepared "last minute".	Good Completes 4 of the 5 requirements Work products match teacher expectation.Shows pride in workmanship. Demonstrates some ability to handle tasks learned while using some time management skill.	Excellent Demonstrates the ability to handle tasks learned with little or no assistance, performs tasks demonstrating time management skill, seeks to help others in need of help, works to the best of their ability.Work products exceed expectation.
Professionalism	Poor Frequent inappropriate behavior. More than once per day requires reminders to respect the learning environment. Often student does not listen when learning leader or classmates talk. More than once student engaged in off-task behavior or improper use of technology.	Fair Appropriate behavior demonstrated most of the time. Sometimes student does not listen when classmates talk. At least once student engaged in off-task behavior or improper use of technology.	Good Appropriate behavior in the classroom. Respects others' ideas and property. Always listens when the leader or classmates talk. Stays on task.Requires some supervision.	Excellent Positive attitude and respect for others. Appropriate behavior in the classroom with peers and instructors.Stays on task and helps others when necessary.Requires minimal supervision.

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric