iRubric: MDAS 110 Written Project rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

MDAS 110 Written Project

Case study analysis for Medical Asisting

Rubric Code: Q49C28

By jveinot10

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Medical

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Written Project Rubric
	Excellent 3 pts	Good 2 pts	Fair 1 pts	Poor 0 pts
Quality of Answer	Excellent Responses demonstrate a high degree of reflection, utilizing relevant examples of the concepts. Answers are organized in a logical way.	Good Many answers are pulled verbatim from text withut elaboration or original interpretation. Answers show some degree of organization.	Fair Answers contain many sentences pulled verbatim from text and are short with no elaboration or original interpretation.	Poor No answers provided.
AAMA code of ethics application	Excellent AAMA code of ethics and HIPPA applied demonstrating a high level of reflection utilizing relevant examples to the case study.	Good AAMA code of ethics and HIPPA is applied, but with a limited degree of reflection and examples.	Fair AAMA code of ethics and HIPPA is only partially applied and no reflection or examples.	Poor No evidence of AMAA code of ethics of HIPPA.
Supporting data/evidence	Excellent Evidence of search, selection, and source evaluation skills; notable identification of at least 2 relevant resources.	Good Demonstrates adequate skill in searching, selecting, and evaluating, but less than 2 relevant resources.	Fair Demonstrates somes skill in searching, selecting, and evaluating, but without relevant resources.	Poor No outside resources.
Communicates effectively	Excellent Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and errors are minimal. Organization is clear and consistent and sources are cited effectively.	Good In general, language does not interfere with comunication, errors are not distracting or frequent. most courses are cited correctly.	Fair In many place, language obscures meaning and grammar, syntax, or other errors are distracting or repeated. Few sources are cited.	Poor Language is difficult to read and understand and there are no sources cited.