Skip to main content

iRubric: Final Project: Grading Rubric Developement

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Final Project: Grading Rubric Developement 
The Impact of Technology Policies on Student Engagement and Learning.
Rubric Code: Q252BBC
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Final Project
  Poor (0-6 pts)

20 pts

Fair (7-13 pts)

20 pts

Good (14-17 pts)

20 pts

Excellent (18-20 pts)

20 pts

Clarity of Purpose and Audience

Poor (0-6 pts)

Purpose and audience are not identified or are incorrect.
Fair (7-13 pts)

Purpose or audience is unclear, vague, or only briefly mentioned.
Good (14-17 pts)

Purpose and audience are stated but lack depth or consistent reinforcement throughout the presentation.
Excellent (18-20 pts)

Presentation clearly states the purpose and identifies high school teachers and administrators as the target audience. The goals of the project and intended classroom impact are clearly explained and consistently reinforced throughout.
Technology Policy Focus and Accuracy

Poor (0-6 pts)

Does not meaningfully address classroom technology policies.
Fair (7-13 pts)

Addresses only one or two of the technology areas or provides minimal explanation.
Good (14-17 pts)

Addresses all three areas (Chromebooks, cell phones, ear buds) but explanation is lacking in depth or practical detail.
Excellent (18-20 pts)

Clearly explains policies related to Chromebooks, cell phones, and earbuds/headphones with accurate detailed and practical classroom applications. Includes clear boundaries and rationale for each.
Strategies for Student Engagment

Poor (0-6 pts)

Includes fewer than 4 strategies or strategies are unclear or impractical.
Fair (7-13 pts)

Includes 4-6 strategies with limited explanation or weak classroom connection.
Good (14-17 pts)

Includes 7-9 strategies with some explanation and classroom connection.
Excellent (18-20 pts)

Includes 10-15 specific, realistic, and classroom ready strategies for improving engagement while managing technology.
Use of Reasearch and Evidence

Poor (0-6 pts)

Used fewer than 2 sources or sources are not relevant or credible.
Fair (7-13 pts)

Use 2 sources or sources are weakly connected to the project's claims.
Good (14-17 pts)

Uses at least 3 sources, though integration may be more summary based than logic or not at all recent.
Excellent (18-20 pts)

Uses at least 4 credible sources from the last 5 years. Research is clearly integrated to support claims about engagement, distractions, and technology policies.
Organization, Clarity, and Professional Presentati

Poor (0-6 pts)

Presentation is disorganized, difficult to follow, or contains 10+ errors that interfere with understanding.
Fair (7-13 pts)

Organization is inconsistent or unclear in places with 6-9 grammar/mechanics errors.
Good (14-17 pts)

Organization is mostly clear with 3-6 minor grammar/mechanics errors. Flow is understandable but may have minor gaps.
Excellent (18-20 pts)

Presentation is well organized, logically sequenced, and easy to follow. Writing is clear, professional and contains 0-2 minor grammar/mechanics errors. Visuals or blog formatting enhances readability.




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n203