- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Evidence Battle Similarities vs Differences rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Evidence Battle Similarities vs Differences Rubric Code: Q24WCXW By MisterBonifacio Draft Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 6-8


	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts	5 pts
Historical Accuracy (1-5 points)	Poor 1: Inaccurate or irrelevant facts	Fair 2: Mostly inaccurate or irrelevant facts	Good 3: A mix of accurate and inaccurate facts	Excellent 4: Mostly accurate and relevant facts 5: Accurate and relevant facts throughout	5 5: Accurate and relevant facts throughout
Persuasiveness (1-5 points)	Poor 1: Arguments are weak or unclear	Fair 2: Some arguments are weak or unclear	Good 3: Arguments are mostly clear but could be more compelling	Excellent 4: Arguments are compelling and mostly well-articulated	5 5: Arguments are compelling and well-articulated, swaying the audience
Creativity (1-5 points)	Poor 1: Lacks originality and thoughtfulness	Fair 2: Minimal originality and thoughtfulness	Good 3: Moderate originality and thoughtfulness	Excellent 4: High originality and thoughtfulness	5 5: Exceptional originality and thoughtfulness in presenting similarities and differences
Delivery (1-5 points)	Poor 1: Performance is difficult to understand or engage with	Fair 2: Performance is somewhat engaging, but has issues with clarity, rhythm, or teamwork	Good 3: Performance is engaging with minor issues in clarity, rhythm, or teamwork	Excellent 4: Performance is engaging, with clear enunciation, rhythm, and good teamwork	5 5: Performance is highly engaging, with excellent enunciation, rhythm, and teamwork
Participation (1-5 points)	Poor 1: Limited or no contribution from all group members	Fair 2: Uneven or minimal contribution from all group members	Good 3: Moderate contribution from all group members	Excellent 4: High contribution from all group members	5 5: All group members contributed equally and effectively to research, writing, and performance