Skip to main content

iRubric: Marketing Plan Group Project Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Marketing Plan Group Project Presentation 
Evaluation criteria for Group Marketing Plan Presentation
Rubric Code: Q2445BX
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Criteria
Maximum Rating: 150 Points
  Poor

(N/A)

Satisfactory

(N/A)

Excellent

(N/A)

Mission

10 pts.

Poor

Has no mission statement for company and/or product or statement is not distinctive. (5)
Satisfactory

Mission statement for company and/or product is brief, memorable, and distinctive. but it lacks clarity or does not indicate the primary focus of the business and its benefit to the target audience. (7)
Excellent

Mission statement is brief, memorable, and distinctive. The purpose of the business and/or product is clearly stated and it indicates the primary focus of the business and its benefit to the target audiencet. (10)
SWOT/Situation Analysis

20 pts.

Poor

Little or no detail provided on SWOT and market forces impacting the business. (10)
Satisfactory

Describes the market situation facing the business but content is limited in content and scope. (15)
Excellent

A definitive assessment with lots of detail and key insights.(20)
Marketing Objectives

15 pts.

Poor

Marketing objectives are missing or those that are identified are not quantified or are inappropriate. (5)
Satisfactory

Linkage of marketing objectives to business is not clearly stated. Some of the objectives and goals are unclear and/or not appropriately quantified. (10)
Excellent

The marketing objectives are clearly stated and appropriately quantified. (15)
Product/Service Description

15 pts.

Poor

Service and/or product description is missing. (5)
Satisfactory

Service and/or product description is stated, but somewhat unclear. (10)
Excellent

Service and/or product description is clearly stated and appropriate. Creative use of visuals in presentation. (15)
Target Audience/Segment

15 pts.

Poor

Little or no detail provided on target market and its characteristics and needs. (5)
Satisfactory

Provides a description of the target market and its characteristics and needs, but is limited in depth and use of secondary data to support the assessment. (10)
Excellent

An outstanding assessment that clearly identifies the target market, its characteristics and needs, and utilizes secondary sources to support this assessment. (15)
Promotion Strategy

15 pts.

Poor

Promotion strategy is missing, or, if identified, is weak in detail and specifics on the range of promotional tools used. Does not seem appropriate given the product/service description and. (5)
Satisfactory

Promotion strategy is identified but not described in enough detail to convey a robust promotional strategy. (10)
Excellent

Promotion strategy is appropriately identified and described with a range of promotional tools. (15)
Distribution Strategy

15 pts.

Poor

Distribution strategy is missing, or, if identified, is weak in detail. (5)
Satisfactory

Distribution strategy is identified but not described in enough detail to convey a strong and clear strategy. (10)
Excellent

Distribution strategy is appropriately identified and described with clear identification of how product will be distributed to target audience through distribution channels. (15)
Pricing Strategy

15 pts.

Poor

Pricing strategy is missing or weak. Tactics are unclear and hard to understand. (5)
Satisfactory

Pricing strategy is clear. Most of the tactics are clearly identified, but some detail on tactics is missing, or hard to understand. (10)
Excellent

Pricing strategy or strategies for managing price are thoroughly and clearly identified and reasoned. Sufficient detail about tactics is provided. (15)
Implementation, Evaluation & Contro

15 pts.

Poor

Information not provided on implementation and evaluation of marketing plan or very little detail provided. (5)
Satisfactory

Some information on implementation and evaluation identified, but limited in scope and detail(10)
Excellent

Information on implementation and evaluation thoroughly and clearly identified. (15)
Group Process

15 pts.

Poor

Poor coordination/preparation. Easy to distinguish contributors from non-contributors among group members. (5)
Satisfactory

Good coordination/preparation. All members actively participate and appear comfortable with the subject matter. (10)
Excellent

Outstanding coordination/preparation. All members actively participate and appear very comfortable with the subject matter. Engages audience with outstanding diction/grammar. (15)




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n79