Skip to main content
iRubric: Engineering Design Process rubric

iRubric: Engineering Design Process rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Engineering Design Process 
Engineering Design Process
This rubric is used to assess the students' use of the engineering design process.
Rubric Code: Q2225CW
By richmonda3
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Engineering Design Process
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Design
20 pts

20 pts.
Poor

Little or No evidence of the design process seen as they worked in a group.
Fair

Some evidence of the design process was observed.
Good

Good evidence of the design process through group thinking and brainstorming about what they were going to build.
Excellent

They really got together as a group and imagined/brainstormed what they were going to build and fully exhibited to a high degree what the design process should look like.
Planning
20 pts

20 pts.
Poor

Little or no evidence was planned out. They did not plan what they were going to build nor plan on what materials to use in the building.
Fair

Some evidence of a plan. There was some thought to materials/building, but not really thought out.
Good

Good evidence of planning done. Materials were listed and thought out, but the plan wasn't quite complete.
Excellent

I can really see what you are going to be building. All materials were listed and well thought out.
Organization
10 pts

10 pts.
Poor

Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information.
Fair

Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around.
Good

Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow.
Excellent

Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.
Subject Knowledge
10 pts

10 pts.
Poor

Student does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about subject.
Fair

Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.
Good

Student is at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate.
Excellent

Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.Gphics
Graphics
10 pts

10 pts.
Poor

Student uses superfluous graphics or no graphics
Fair

Student occasionally uses graphics that rarely support text and presentation.
Good

Student's graphics relate to text and presentation.
Excellent

Student's graphics explain and reinforce screen text and presentation.
Mechanics
10 pts

10 pts.
Poor

Student's presentation has four or more spelling errors and/or grammatical errors.
Fair

Presentation has three misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
Good

Presentation has no more than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
Excellent

Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
Eye Contact/ Elocution
10 pts

10 pts.
Poor

Student reads all of report with no eye contact.
Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear.
Fair

Student occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of report.
Student's voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.
Good

Student maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes.
Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation.
Excellent

Student maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes.
Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation.
Time Management
20 pts

20 pts.
Poor

Did not use time well. Time was wasted during the imagine, plan, and design phase of engineering.
Fair

Sometimes used time well. There were times when the group got off task during the imagine, plan, and design phase.
Good

Good use of time, a few times the group got off task, but for the majority of the task time was well spent.
Excellent

Great use of time. The group stayed on task during each phase of the process.
Participation
20 pts

20 pts.
Poor

All or Some group members had to be reminded several times to stay on task.
Fair

Most members participated in the building process. Had to be redirected a few times.
Good

The majority of the members worked together were not redirected that much.
Excellent

All group members worked together. The group never had to be redirected.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98