iRubric: Italian Skit rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Italian Skit

Spanish Skit

Students will create a skit in Italian.

Rubric Code: PC39W4

By italianissimi

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Foreign Languages

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Skit Italian II - Skit Rubric
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3.5 pts	Fair 2.5 pts	Poor 1.5 pts
Structure 4 pts	Excellent Skit has an indepth, complete, logical story with a beginning, middle and end. Skit includes all of the important action and dialogue in the situation portrayed.	Good Skit is a complete, logical story with a beginning, middle and end. Skit includes all of the important action and dialogue in the situation portrayed.	Fair The skit includes most of the important action and dialogue from the situation portrayed. Skit is complete but with a few rough spots; needs more length.	Poor Skit is vague and incomplete with major gaps; length is too short. It is difficult to understand what is going on.
Content 4 pts	Excellent Group uses vocabulary, and cultural insight from chapters studied to date. Vocabulary and cultural elements are properly applied in context. Each student has five lines minimum.	Good Group uses vocabulary, and cultural insight from the chapters studied to date. Some of the vocabulary and cultural information are not properly used in context. Each student has five lines.	Fair Group uses vocabulary and cultural insight from most of the chapters, but elements are not properly used in context. Not all students have five lines.	Poor Skit is lacking vocabulary, and cultural insight. Many students did not have five lines. Used a translator.
Grammar 4 pts	Excellent 1-2 grammar errors.	Good 3-4 grammar errors.	Fair 5-7 grammar errors.	Poor More than 7 grammar errors.
Oral presentation 4 pts	Excellent Lines were memorized. Content was delivered clearly and distinctively all (100-95%) the time; no words were mispronounced. Volume was loud enough to be heard by the audience. Conversation flowed perfectly.	Good Skit was of good quality. Lines were memorized. Speaking was audible and conversation flowed well. Intonation was good. Group spoke clearly and distinctly all (100-95%) the time, but mispronounced 1-3 word(s).	Fair Skit was of acceptable quality: not all lines were memorized, speaking was occasionally hard to hear and had pauses that caused it not to flow well. Content was delivered clearly and distinctly most ( 94-85%) of the time. Mispronounced words were more than 3.	Poor Skit was of poor quality. Most lines were not memorized. Speaking could not be heard & conversation had several pauses. Several words were mumbled and/or mispronounced.
Creativity 4 pts	Excellent Skit showed considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas were presented in a unique and interesting way. Students made an excellent effort to use costumes +/or props which helped make the scene more authentic.	Good Skit showed some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas were presented in an interesting way. Students made a good effort to use costumes +/or props which helped make the scene more authentic.	Fair Skit showed an attempt at originality and inventiveness in part of the presentation. Most students made a good effort to use costumes +/or props which helped make the scene more authentic.	Poor Skit was a rehash of textbook's ideas and/or dialogues and showed very little attempt at original thought. Only a few students made a good effort to use costumes +/or props to make the skit more authentic.
Teamwork 4 pts	Excellent All members contributed an equally significant role to the skit. Members used delivery and rehearsal time wisely. The whole team was completely prepared and had obviously taken rehearsal time seriously.	Good All members contributed to the project, but some members did not play as significant a role. Members mostly stayed on task. The whole team seemed pretty prepared but might have needed to focus more closely during rehearsal time.	Fair All members contributed something, but some members were far less prominent in the production than others. Members strayed off task occasionally. Most of the team was somewhat prepared, but it is clear that rehearsal effort was lacking.	Poor Most of the team did not seem at all prepared. Not all members contributed to the project. 1 or more of members contributed almost nothing. Members rarely stayed on task.all
Rough/Final draft 4 pts	Excellent Rough draft was typed and turned in on time for feedback. Final draft reflected all recommended changes.	Good Rough draft was neatly hand written and turned in on time for correcting. Final draft reflected most of recommended changes.	Fair Rough draft was hand written but not turned in on time for correcting. Final draft reflected some but not all recommended changes.	Poor Rough draft was not neatly hand written and was not turned in on time for feedback. Final draft did not reflect most recommended changes.

Keywords:

Skit, Italian

Subjects:

Foreign Languages

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric