Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Socratic Seminar--Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Socratic Seminar--Rubric
Socratic Seminar--Rubric
NOTE: You will be graded not on how often you participate, but the WAY in which you participate. You must LISTEN to each other, ask questions, cite the text, keep the discussion going, and offer insight. Note also that you can earn participation points by using your white board in the outer circle.
Rubric Code:
PAC6W4
By
silverrose62379
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
ELACC1SL1, & SL3 & SL4
Superior Discussion
33 pts
Great Discussion
28 pts
Good Discussion
25 pts
Average Discussion
24 pts
Poor Discussion
20 pts
Group
Superior Discussion
Entire class participates evenly and enthusiastically in the discussion. All members contribute insight today. Students shared the floor, encouraged each other, and asked thoughtful and insightful questions which kept the discussion at a high level.
Great Discussion
Entire class participates fairly evenly and enthusiastically in the discussion. All members contribute something important today. Students shared the floor, encouraged each other, and asked l questions which kept the discussion moving.
Good Discussion
Entire class participates but somewhat unevenly and enthusiastically in the discussion. All members contributed today. Students did not always share the floor, encourage each other, and ask questions.
Average Discussion
Entire class did not participate in the discussion. A few members did not contribute at all to the discussion or made irrelevant, vague comments. Students did not always share the floor, encourage each other, and ask questions.
Poor Discussion
Entire class did not participate in the discussion. Many members failed to contribute today. Students did not share the floor, encourage each other, and ask questions. Discussion was monopolized by one or two class members. many students were silent.
Individual
Superior Discussion
Offers many contributions. Comments are insightful and show a high level of understanding and clear evidence of reading. Comments move discussion to a higher level, are interesting, and analytical. Asks thoughtful questions. Outer circle notes are excellent. White board comments are relevant and insightful.
Great Discussion
Offers several contributions. Shows evidence of reading and a solid understanding of the text. Comments move discussion forward and are interesting. Asks questions, seeks clarification from others. Outer circle notes are good. White board comments are relevant and interesting.
Good Discussion
Offers a few contributions. Comments show an acceptable level understanding. Comments are a little vague and could be more insightful. Does not asks questions. Acceptable outer circle notes. White board comments are relevant.
Average Discussion
Rarely 0ffers contributions and shows a weak understanding of text and or maybe weak preparation. Comments are vague and/or need more evidence of critical thinking. Fails to ask questions, seek clarification. Outer circle notes lacking. White board participation lacking.
Poor Discussion
Fails to offer any contributions or shows poor understanding of the text and indicates a lack of preparation. Comments are vague and show little evidence of careful reading. Fails to ask questions, seek clarification. No outer circle notes. No white board participation.
Individual
Superior Discussion
Cites clear, convincing evidence and specific support for observations, quoting the text each time.
Great Discussion
Cites solid evidence and specific support for observation, directly quoting the text several times.
Good Discussion
Cites evidence and specific support for observation, directly quoting the text at least once.
Average Discussion
Offers specific examples for support of observations, but does not directly quote the text.
Poor Discussion
Student does not use text during seminar; does not support assertions; responses are vague. Or student does not have text today.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.