iRubric: Mock Interview rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Mock Interview

Students will investigate a "mock" crime scene after the incident. The scene will be setup by assigned to students in another class, and investigated a by students within the class. Students will apply their extensive knowledge of crime scene investigation, interviewing techniques, procedures for recording and taking notes, and tactics to elicit responses from witnesses or suspects. A heavy concentration on Investigation techniques and use of language and intitutive use of critical thinking will be evaluated.

Rubric Code: P6CX54

By Keturah

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Law

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

To Be Evaluated
	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 60 pts
Initial Response student must re-assess the crime, investigate who is involved, interview and articulate purpose of interview.	Poor Slow response, slow to organize and demonstrated unacceptable and confusing practices. Poor assessment and public relations No gloves	Fair Fair response and initial assessment. Appeared comfortable and prepared interviewing suspects.	Good Well done, Command Presence noted, comfortable interviewing suspects, maintained control while securing information
Secure and Control Scene The student demonstrated command of the interview at all times instead of allowing the "mock" suspects control the interview	Poor Did not secure and control the scene. Professional behavior and Integrity compromised, No field notes	Fair Some security meadsures were taken , displayed professional behavior but improvement is needed. Basic field notes	Good Quickly took control of scene and demonstrated professional behavior, explained purpose of interview to others; had prepared questions.
Statements collected and Questions Student had prepared questions and mock signatory documents for suspects to sign.	Poor Did not perform walkthrough, Unable to get suspects to answer questions, did not take notes about the crime or Poor documentation. No gloves	Fair Satisfactory, preparation but improvement is recommended	Good Collection of statements took place in an organized and cautious manner. All information was identified and clarifiyed. Notes were taken and prepared in advance. Well done
Written Report Follow-up of interview is prepared and submitted	Poor Did not document results of interview. Notes were unclear. Written report incomplete or not done No follow up scheduled	Fair Satisfactory, but minimum completed in written report.	Good Interview write-up is complete and accurate. Submitted timely