Skip to main content

iRubric: Field Experience Documentation and Reflection 2 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Field Experience Documentation and Reflection 2 
Rubric Code: P5C887
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Field Experience Paper
  Poor

10 pts

weak

15 pts

good

20 pts

excellent

25 pts

content

Poor

minimal 2-3 pages with little or no reference to the readings and to development
weak

3 pages with several connections to child development and to what makes a quailty program
good

3-4 pages of detail from the observation with consistent commentary on development and best practice
excellent

4-5 pages of detail from the observation with excellent insight into the implications of best practice to the observed child care setting interviews, and experiences, meaningful reflections as well as a "big picture" reflection on the meaning of the experience and at least 8 professional citations
form

Poor

documentation and reflection is piecemeal and difficult to understand because of lack of overall organization, grammar, spelling
weak

documentation and reflection shows minimal clarity of organization and attention to grammar and spelling
good

documentation and reflection shows sufficient organization and clarity, with less than 7 errors of grammar and spelling
excellent

documentation and reflection is clearly polished and edited, easy to understand, clear in purpose, and has less than 3 errors of minor technical form
ethics

Poor

breaches of respect or confidentiality
weak

background check provided, but could show more respect and care for confidentiality for children and adults in the narrative
good

background check is provided, and there are no breaches of respect and confidentiality for children and adults in the narrative
excellent

background check is submitted on time, and there is clear attention to confidentiality and respectful, constructive treatment of negative observations
quality of the experience

Poor

less than 5 hours of observation, interview, and work with the children
weak

5 hours of observation and volunteer work, but with little substance or perspective documented
good

5 hours of observation and volunteer work documented with a variety of references to the information in the text
excellent

5+ hours of observation, interview, volunteer work documented with a variety of references to the information in the text.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224