iRubric: On-line course peer evaluation rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

On-line course peer evaluation

Rubric Code: P245X8

By stalewski

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

On-line course evaluation rubric
	Minimal 1 pts	Average 2 pts	Exemplary 3 pts
Campus resources and learner suppor	Minimal Course contains limited information for use of course management software and other campus resources (library, SAC, etc.) Basic information is available but not complete or well organized for the scope of resources needed for this course	Average Course contains basic information for use of course managemement software and other campus resources. Some of the neccessary exemplars are available, information is available but not always clear or clearly accessible	Exemplary Course contains complete information for use of course managment software and other campus resources. Examples: D2L first day hand-out, use of drop-box, campus computer support, on-line library resources are all included in an organized manner that is useful to students.
Syllabus and instructor information	Minimal A complete syllabus that meets university policy is available.	Average A complete syllabus that meets university policy is available. Components of instructor availability, expectations for response or the CHS honor code are absent	Exemplary A complete syllabus listing all course activities and dates is available on-line. All University required policies are referenced. CHS honor code is referenced. Instructor contact information and hours of availability are published. The instructor is available by more than one means. Expectations for instructor response are listed.
Teaching with technology	Minimal This courese offers limited resources to support course content	Average This courese offers some resources to support course content	Exemplary This courese offers multiple resources to support course content Examples: multi-media presentations, internet links to extra readings or current articles, podcasts/video supplements
Course design - 2 way communication	Minimal Course offers limited or no opportunities for two-way communication between students and with the instructor.	Average Course offers some opportunities and methods for two-way communication between students and with the instructor.	Exemplary Course offers frequent opportunities and multiple methods for two-way communication between students and with the instructor. Examples: Chat rooms, virtual office hours, discussion forums, MUVEs, WIKIS, blogs
Course design - Learning objectives	Minimal Learning objectives are incomplete or missing. Blended learning activities appear to be independent from the face-to-face component.	Average Learning objectives are defined but it is unclear how course activities and assessment are linked to objectives. Blended course activities are integrated but how is not always clear.	Exemplary Learning objectives are defined and clearly linked to course activities and assessments. Blended course activities are clearly integrated and linked to learning objectives
Course design-Critical thinking	Minimal The course does not provide methods for developing critical thinking skills outside of quizzes and tests	Average The course provides occassional methods for students to develop critical thinking skills.	Exemplary The course provides multiple methods for students to develop critical thinking skills. Examples: Reflective responses Journal article analysis Discussion forums Class assessment techniques
Assessment of student learning	Minimal Assessment of student learning is done.	Average Assessment of student learning occurs several times during the semester	Exemplary Frequent and multiple types of assessments are used to measure student learning
Student self-assessment	Minimal Students don not have the opportunity to self-assess or have peer feedback	Average Students have the opportunity to self-assess or have peer feedback at some point in the semester	Exemplary Students have the opportunity to self-assess or have peer feedback throughout the semester
Expectations of students	Minimal Rubrics or other guidelines or exemplars are not available to students regarding quality work and instructor expectations	Average	Exemplary Rubrics or other guidelines or exemplars are available to students regarding quality work and instructor expectations
Universal design	Minimal Universal design (accessibility) is not addressed	Average Universal design (accessibility) is somewhat addressed	Exemplary Universal design (accessibility) is fully addressed.
Student feedback -technology	Minimal Students are not given formal and/or informal opportunity to provide feedback to the instructor regarding course technology	Average Students are given at least one formal and/or informal opportunity to provide feedback to the instructor regarding course technology	Exemplary Students are given more than one formal and/or informal opportunities to provide feedback to the instructor regarding course technology. Feedback is used to make course adjustments if needed
Feedback - content	Minimal Students are not given opportunities to provide feedback to the instructor regarding course technology.	Average Students are given at least formal and/or informal opportunities to provide feedback to the instructor regarding course content.	Exemplary Students are given more than one formal and/or informal opportunities to provide feedback to the instructor regarding course content.

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric