Skip to main content
iRubric: Historical Role Play rubric

iRubric: Historical Role Play rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Historical Role Play 
Historical Role Play
Rubric for Visitors From History! assignment in which the students speak/share "as" a desert mother or early church father from Christian history. They must stay in character and use chosen medium creatively to denote who they are in history, and to project personality, faith commitment, personal challenges, etc. They must offer advice to the present as defined in the assignment.
Rubric Code: P23W3WW
By broylesk
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Voices from the Past/Advice for the Future
Enter rubric description
  Excellent

8 pts

Adequate

6 pts

Proficient

4 pts

Limited

2 pts

Did Not Attempt

0 pts

Imagination & Creativity
15 %

Excellent

Demonstrates insight to context & character & powerfully enhances the role play.
Adequate

Demonstrates thoughtfulness &
completely enhances the role play.
Proficient

Demonstrates awareness of the context & character; developing acceptably enhances the role play.
Limited

Demonstrates little awareness of the context & character; does
little to enhance the
role play.
Did Not Attempt

Demonstrates no development of context & character. No role play attempted.
Achievement of Purpose
20 %

(is the purpose of the character clear? is a solution to a specific challenge offered that is based on the character and his/her life, theology, wisdom, etc? )
Excellent

Character's purpose is clearly established &
effectively sustained.
Adequate

Character's purpose is clearly established & generally sustained.
Proficient

Character's purpose is established but may not be sustained.
Limited

Character's purpose is vaguely established & may not be sustained.
Did Not Attempt

Character has no purpose related to the assignment expectations.
Presentation of Character
30 %

(was the student "in character?")
Excellent

Convincing communication of character’s feelings, historical situation, challenges faced because of faith & motives in offering advice. Did not break character.
Adequate

Competent communication of character’s feelings,challenges faced because of faith, situations & motives. Rarely broke character.
Proficient

Adequate communication of character’s
feelings, challenges faced because of faith, situation & motives. Sometimes broke character.
Limited

Limited communication of character’s
feelings,challenges faced because of faith, situation & motives. Often broke or never stayed in character.
Did Not Attempt

No complexity in role play present at any level. No role play attempted.
Use of Non-Verbal Cues
15 %

(voice, gestures, eye contact, props, costumes, visual aids, images, audio)
Excellent

Impressive variety of non-verbal cues used; cues used in an exemplary way as appropriate to the medium selected.
Adequate

Good variety of non-verbal cues used; cues used to enhance character.
Proficient

Satisfactory variety of non-verbal cues used; cues are used in a limited way.
Limited

Limited variety of non-verbal cues used; cues are not used in a developing way.
Did Not Attempt

No attempt made to use cues as appropriate to the medium.
Research Support
20 %

(are references provided and cited correctly? Is character historically accurate?)
Excellent

Focused, complex work delivered. Background knowledge cited during project delivery; evident research was done. Reference page included in final submission.
Adequate

Focused, and some what complex work delivered; some background knowledge cited during project delivery; evident some research was done. Reference page included though some errors evident.
Proficient

Sometimes willing & focused during presentation; little background knowledge cited during presentation; research was done, but reference page is not included or only partially complete. Errors in content and citation evident.
Limited

Rarely willing & focused during presentation; no background knowledge cited during presentation; evident little to no research was done. No reference page offered, or incomplete reference page submitted. Errors in content and citation evident.
Did Not Attempt

No attempt made to provide focused, complex work. No attempt made to incorporate research. No evidence of research provided.



Keywords:
  • role play, visitors/voices, history, reenactment, simulation,

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98