Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Website / ePortfolio Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Website / ePortfolio Rubric
Website / ePortfolio Rubric
Rubric to evaluate a website or ePortfolio made by students.
Rubric Code:
P22377B
By
Rhonda85
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
ePortfolio
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
ePortfolio Rubric
Excellent
10 pts
Good
5 pts
Poor
0 pts
Design Elements
Background
Excellent
Background is exceptionally attractive, consistent across pages, adds to the theme or purpose of the site, and does not detract from readability.
Good
Background is attractive, consistent across pages, adds to the theme or purpose of the site, and does not detract from readability.
Poor
Background detracts from the readability of the site.
Colors
Excellent
Colors of background, fonts, unvisited and visited links form a pleasing palette, do not detract from the content, and are consistent across pages.
Good
Colors of background, fonts, unvisited and visited links do not detract from the content, and are consistent across pages.
Poor
Colors of background, fonts, unvisited and visited links make the content hard to read or otherwise distract the reader.
Fonts
Excellent
The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. Use of font styles (italic, bold, underline) is used consistently and improves readability.
Good
The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
Poor
A wide variety of fonts, styles and point sizes was used giving the page a confusing feel.
Purpose & Theme
Excellent
The site has a well-stated clear purpose and theme that is carried out throughout the site.
Good
The site has a clearly stated purpose and theme, but may have one or two elements that do not seem to be related to it.
Poor
The site lacks a purpose and theme.
Graphics
Excellent
Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the site, are thoughtfully cropped, are of high quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Good
Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the site, are of good quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Poor
Graphics seem randomly chosen, are of low quality, OR distract the reader.
Layout
Excellent
The Web site has an exceptionally attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements. White space, graphic elements and/or alignment are used effectively to organize material.
Good
The Web pages have an attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements.
Poor
The Web pages are cluttered looking or confusing. It is often difficult to locate important elements.
Navigation
Excellent
Links for navigation are clearly labeled, consistently placed, allow the reader to easily move from a page to related pages (forward and back), and take the reader where s/he expects to go. A user does not become lost.
Good
Links for navigation are clearly labeled, allow the reader to easily move from a page to related pages (forward and back), and internal links take the reader where s/he expects to go. A user rarely becomes lost.
Poor
Some links do not take the reader to the sites described. A user typically feels lost.
Content
Content Quality
Excellent
All text is useful and informative and all embedded or linked objects are functioning correctly.
Good
Missing 1 element.
Poor
More than 2 elements are not useful or not functioning correctly.
Spelling and Grammar
Excellent
There are no errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Web site.
Good
There are 1-3 errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Web site.
Poor
There are more than 4 errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Web site.
Outcome
Interest
Excellent
The author has made an exceptional attempt to make the content of this Web site interesting to the people for whom it is intended.
Good
The author has tried to make the content of this Web site interesting to the people for whom it is intended.
Poor
The author has provided only the minimum amount of information and has not transformed the information to make it more interesting to the audience (e.g., has only provided a list of links to the content of others).
Subjects:
Arts and Design
English
Types:
ePortfolio
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More ePortfolio rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.