Skip to main content

iRubric: Force Proof Structure Performance Task rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Force Proof Structure Performance Task 
You have been hired as the structural engineer in charge of designing a new housing project in a devastated area. You must research the area to know what type of structure is best suited to withstand the external and internal forces acting against it. You must provide a sketch of design or build a 3-D model. You will present your budget and justification for materials in class.
Rubric Code: NX76758
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Earthquake Proof Structure
  Meets

5 pts

Approaches

3 pts

Falls Far Below

1 pts

Meets no expectations

0 pts

Construction Sketch

Meets

• Very or Fairly neat
• Materials and measurments are clearly defined
• Most areas are
understandable
• Colorful and creative
Approaches

• Some area appear incomplete
• Some materials and measurements are hard to figure out, or are not present or are not completely to scale
• A little hard to follow
• Not very colorful
Falls Far Below

• Incomplete or not neat enough to read
• Sketch was sloppy
• Quite hard to follow
•No measurements included, or completely off scale
• No attempt to make
it interesting or
colorful
•apparent that no effort was made
Meets no expectations

•Was not turned in or completed
Prototype/ physical design

Meets

•Creative design and use of materials.
•Follows the structural guidelines.
•Effort is evident and much time was taken to complete project.
Approaches

•Somewhat creative design and use of materials.
•Follows some of the structural guidelines.
•Some effort is evident and some time was taken to complete project.
Falls Far Below

•Lacks a creative design or use of materials.
•Structural guidelines were ignored.
•No effort was made to build a structure.
Meets no expectations

•Was not turned in or completed
Explanation of reasons why

Meets

•Answers with details.
•Evidence of a well thought out design.
•Nothing included that wasn't logical to the explanation.
Approaches

Was able to justify some of the building material and how it could withstand forces acting against it.
Budget is missing details or not complete.
Falls Far Below

•No attempt was made to explain why the structure would work
•No explanation included.
•Lack of evidence of well thought out design.
Meets no expectations

•Was not turned in or completed
Country/ Force Proof Research

Meets

• Research on force proofing is highly evident.
• Student spent an obvious amount of time researching all the expected details and more.
Approaches

• Research on force proofing is somewhat evident.
• Student spent an some amount of time researching all the expected details.
Falls Far Below

• Research on force proofing is barely evident.
• Student spent very little amount of time researching all the expected details.
Meets no expectations

•Was not turned in or completed or was entirely plagiarized
Presentation

Meets

•Speaks clearly and loudly
•Gives detailed facts about location, structure, etc.
Approaches

•Mostly clear and loud voice
•Gives some facts on forces and structure and the region the structure is in
Falls Far Below

• no facts about country or forces or the structure included
Meets no expectations

•does not present




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202