iRubric: SOCS 161 Final Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

SOCS 161 Final Project

Solving Poverty in WV

Rubric Code: NX47C5X

By kwhitenrctc

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

SOCS 161 Fall 2015
	Poor 0 - 9 (N/A)	Fair 10 - 14 (N/A)	Good 15 - 19 (N/A)	Excellent 20 - 25 (N/A)	Total 25 pts
Completed Notebook	Poor 0 - 9 Notebook was lacking in a well thought out plan. Not all participants were involved in carrying out the project.	Fair 10 - 14 Notebook does not give much detail into the project. Less than three hours were put into the project.	Good 15 - 19 Notebook includes participants, dates, and a general description of the project. Between 3-5 hours was spent planning. Most individuals carried out their part.	Excellent 20 - 25 Notebook includes dates, times, participants, and project discussions as well as how the project was determined. A considerable amount of time was put into planning. Excess of five hours. All participants carried out their part.	Total
Oral Presentation	Poor 0 - 9 No oral presentation or pictures of the activity.	Fair 10 - 14 Oral presentation is only given by one group member who speaks to everyone. It evident not everyone participated in the project. Minimal preparation for the presentation.	Good 15 - 19 Only a few group members participate in the oral presentation. Some pictures, but substantial group work is not evident.	Excellent 20 - 25 PPT presentation is well presented with all members participating. There are pictures showing the work carried out.	Total
ProJect Completion	Poor 0 - 9 Lack of impact on the community on any level. No evidence of change.	Fair 10 - 14 Project made a micro impact with little involvement in changing the community as evidenced by pictures and student remarks.	Good 15 - 19 Project made a mezzo impact on a smaller scale as evidence by pictures and student remarks.	Excellent 20 - 25 Project made a macro impact on the community as evidenced by pictures and student remarks.	Total
Goals and Objectives	Poor 0 - 9 Lack of planning of goals and objectives	Fair 10 - 14 Minimal planning and effort was put into the project.	Good 15 - 19 The students chose a project that made an immediate change, however it is not sustainable beyond eeg	Excellent 20 - 25 The goal is able to be sustainable for a period of time.	Total