iRubric: Teaching Presentation Evaluation - Ed 4990 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Teaching Presentation Evaluation - Ed 4990

Lesson Planning

Rubric Code: NBAXWC

By nbiggs

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Presentation Enter rubric description
	Poor (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Excellent (N/A)
Introduction Lesson was introduced to the seminar class.	Poor The presenter did not provide background information on the class taught or the lesson.	Fair The presenter provided background information on the class taught or the lesson but not about both.	Good The information was presented, but left some seminar participants confused.	Excellent Seminar participants clearly understood the context of the lesson being explained.
Objective and Alignment Objective clearly identified to the class. The alignment of activities to objective was clear.	Poor No explanation to the seminar class of what objective was given to the class begin taught. There was no alignment of the lesson to any objective.	Fair An objective may have been stated but students did not understand the objective or expected outcome. Lesson taught is loosely aligned to the learning objective or outcome expected.	Good The learning objective was clearly stated and understood by the class. OR Lesson taught is clearly aligned to the learning objective or outcome expected.	Excellent The learning objective was shared with seminar participants and how the objective was shared with his/her students was explained. Lesson taught is clearly aligned to the learning objective or outcome expected.
Teaching Plan The lesson includes teaching strategies that meet various learners in the classroom.	Poor Lesson was not taught in more than one way.	Fair Further development needed to meet the needs of all students.	Good The use of a variety of teaching strategies was explained, but not why the strategies were used.	Excellent The lesson included teaching strategies that met the needs of various learners in the classroom.
Assessment/Check for Understanding How do you know the students have mastered the day’s objective? How much work will provide you that information?	Poor No discussion of how student mastery would be determined.	Fair Minimal discussion of how student mastery would be assessed was given to the seminar. Some students' learning was assessed by the instructor, but not all students.	Good Assessment of student mastery of lesson was included in the presentation. Student learning was clearly monitored throughout the lesson.	Excellent Assessment of each student's mastery of lesson was included in the presentation. Data was presented to demonstrate student mastery.
Reflection What questions do you (the teacher) want to ask yourself? after this lesson that will help you improve you teaching or better assist your students? Asked question of observers.	Poor No discussion of how well the lesson worked and what you would change the next time.	Fair Minimal discussion of how well the lesson worked OR what would be changed the next time.	Good Minimal discussion of how well the lesson worked AND what would be changed the next time.	Excellent Discussed how well the lesson worked and what would be changed the next time.
Copies of Lesson Plan and Materials Copies of lesson plan, materials/resources used were distributed to seminar group.	Poor Criteria not met.	Fair Minimal copies were distributed.	Good Minimal copies were distributed.	Excellent Meets criteria
Technology Integration The presentation was augmented by the use of technology.	Poor There was no use of technology in the presentation. It was difficult to understand the presentation.	Fair Text used was too great for the amount of space provided. There was limited use of graphics/videos.	Good Presenter utilized graphics/videos throughout the presentation. Written text used in presentation was easy to read and attractive.	Excellent Graphics/videos used enhanced the presentation to seminar group.
Time Presentation was within the presentation timeframe.	Poor Did not use time to focus on topic. Presentation was five minutes under or over the time limit.	Fair Used some of the class time well during the presentation. Presentation was user or over the time limit by three minutes.	Good Used time well during the presentation. Information presented was pertinent. Presentation was over the time limit by one minute.	Excellent Used time well during the presentation. Information presented was pertinent. Presentation was within the 15-20 minute limits.

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric