iRubric: Annotated Bibliography rubric

Analysis and critique of topic evident throughout. The paper displays critical thinking and avoids simplistic description or summary of the information. Demonstrates a level of synthesis and evaluation.
Correct APA formatting, Mainly error free

Findings are considered but not necessarily connected. While there is some description, there is also an appropriate level of critical thinking and analysis of the evidence. Considers the application of synthesis & evaluation.
Correct APA formatting, Mainly error free.

There is more description than critical thinking or analysis. Some evidence does not support points or may appear inappropriate. Appropriate amount of literature cited.
Correct APA formatting, Mainly error free.

The paper describes some papers sourced and may discuss either their strengths or weakness.
Quotes may be used, but with little evidence of analysis to support their relationship to the key content of the paper. There are a few links to clinical practice. Limited amount of literature cited.
Minor problems with referencing in reference list or in-text referencing.

There is general failure to support statements or evidence presented. There is no attempt made to critique the literature sourced or link to clinical practice. Work is descriptive with no evidence of analysis. Inadequate amount of literature cited.
Sources not acknowledged or
APA referencing not used or
More than 10 per cent direct quotes.

There has been no effort to appraise the articles.
Sources not acknowledged or
APA referencing not used or
More than 10 per cent direct quotes