iRubric: Microteaching rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Microteaching

A rubric for the microteaching sessions that will be utilized throughout the course.

Rubric Code: N588X8

By OSU791

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Graduate

Microteaching
	Superior 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 0 pts
Planning	Superior Student constructed well-developed, comprehensive lesson plans that outline overall objectives, procedure, assessment techniques and closure. All pieces flow together and provide adequate transition.	Good Lesson plans contain objectives, procedures, assessments and closure – but some are better developed than others. Transition components may need to be addressed.	Fair Lesson plans tap into the basic objectives and procedures, but little or no assessment or closure components are included. Some disorganization in the prepared lesson plan.	Poor Lesson plan not submitted or does not connect to objectives, procedures, assessments or closure. Structure of lesson plan is difficult to ascertain and is either vague or missing.
Integration of Technology	Superior Student seamlessly integrates appropriate technology into the lesson. Technology chosen significantly enhances lesson and connects directly to learning objectives. Student is able to utilize demonstrated technology with a very high level of proficiency.	Good Lesson incorporates technology effectively, but is “forced” or awkward in its integration. General connection to overall lesson objectives, but not all are fully defined and/or integrated. Student demonstrates proficient use of the selected technology.	Fair Selected technology is provided, but is external to the overall lesson objectives and structure. Technology does not enhance lesson, and may detract from overall learning objectives. Students do not demonstrate suitable level of ability with selected technology.	Poor Technology component either not included or is contrary to stated lesson objectives. Utilization of technology reduces or eliminates effective learning within the lesson. Students are unable to utilize technology nor demonstrate their knowledge about the selected technology.
Lesson Delivery	Superior Student presents lesson materials in a very clear and concise manner that focuses on lesson objectives. Student speaks at an appropriate volume and seeks to reduce or eliminate distractions that may impact student learning.	Good Student delivers lesson in an effective and manageable manner. There is a loose connection to learning objectives throughout the lesson. Presented is occasionally difficult to hear and/or understand.	Fair Student provides lesson material in a static and not-fully effective manner. Some disconnection regarding lesson objectives and lesson delivery. Student is frequently difficult to hear or understand.	Poor Lesson delivery is not present or not comprehendible. No connection to lesson topic or objectives is evident.
Individualization/Special Inclusion	Superior Specific initiatives and procedures are developed and presented in order to provide individualized learning opportunities for students. Special focus includes ESL population, students with concentration issues and gifted student populations.	Good General strategies are developed and discussed to support effective learning of differentiated groups of students. Not all strategies are implemented and/or discussed. Key population segments are identified and addressed.	Fair Numerous populations are discussed, but lesson plan does not include modification for these various groups. No specific strategies are developed for key population groups.	Poor No modifications or plans for individualization are developed or discussed. All students are presented identical lesson procedures and assessments.
Expectations	Superior Student exceeds general rubric guidelines and surpasses instructor expectations. Student provides new avenues of thought and pedagogy through the microlesson process.	Good Student meets general rubric guidelines and attempts to surpass instructor expectations. Effective use of existing and/or provided materials.	Fair Student meets minimum rubric guidelines in most categories. Student limits efforts to assignment description and guidelines.	Poor Student did not meet expectations in any portion of the assignment. Student performance was well below instructor expectations.

Keywords:

microteaching, presentation, technology

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric