Skip to main content

iRubric: GROUP PRESENTATIONS rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
GROUP PRESENTATIONS 
This rubric will be used to evaluate each of the group presentations
Rubric Code: N457B7
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric GROUP PRESENTATIONS
Enter rubric description
  Incomplete

1 pts

Poor

2 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

4 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Group participation
5 pts

Enter criteria description

Incomplete

The teammates never worked from others’ ideas. It seems as though only a single person worked on the
presentation.
Poor

The teammates rarely worked from others’ ideas. It seems as though only a few people worked on the
presentation.
Fair

The teammates sometimes worked from others’ ideas. However it seems as though certain people did not do as much work as others.
Good

The teammates worked from others’ ideas most
of the time. And it seems like every did some work, but some people are carrying the
presentation.
Excellent

The teammates always worked from others’ ideas. It was evident that all of the group
members contributed
equally to the
presentation.
Content
5 pts

Enter criteria description

Incomplete

The presentation contained
little to no valuable material. This presentation did not contributed to the classes socio-cultural knowledge of body art.
Poor

The presentation included the minimum amount material to accomplish the assignment and lacked value for the classes socio-cultural knowledge of body art
Fair

The presentation had
some useful material and contributed to the classes socio-cultural knowledge of body art
Good

Presentation had
valuable material and contributed to the classes socio-cultural knowledge of body art
Excellent

Presentation had
an exceptional
amount of valuable material and effectively contributed to the classes socio-cultural knowledge of body art
Presentation
5 pts

Enter criteria description

Incomplete

The presentation
lacked organization and
had little evidence
of preparation.
Poor

There were minimal signs of organization or
preparation.
Fair

The presentation had organizing ideas but could have been much
stronger with better preparation
Good

The presentation
was mostly organized, and prepared but easy to follow.
Excellent

The presentation
was well organized, well
prepared and easy to follow.
Questions
5 pts

Incomplete

Questions posed in the assignment were not addressed in the presentation.
Poor

Some questions posed in the assignment were addressed in the presentation and were poorly discussed.
Fair

Most questions posed in the assignment were addressed in the presentation and most were thoroughly discussed.
Good

All questions posed in the assignment were addressed in the presentation and most were thoroughly discussed.
Excellent

All questions posed in the assignment were addressed in the presentation and thoroughly discussed.
Understanding
5 pts

Incomplete

The presentation did not illustrated a clear understating of their assigned study.
Poor

The presentation illustrated incomplete understanding of their assigned studies. it was not clear if items such as hypotheses, methods, results and possible problems were understood.
Fair

The presentation illustrated an understating of their some aspects of the assigned study.
Good

The presentation illustrated a good understating of their assigned study, including hypotheses, methods, results and possible problems
Excellent

The presentation illustrated a clear understating of their assigned study, including hypotheses, methods, results and possible problems
Enter Title
5 pts

Generalization

Incomplete

Students did not exhibited any ability to relate the information in their assigned article to the Koch 2009 article.
Poor

Students exhibited a weak ability to relate the information in their assigned article to the Koch 2009 article.
Fair

Students exhibited a fair ability to relate the information in their assigned article to the Koch 2009 article.
Good

Students exhibited a good ability to relate the information in their assigned article to the Koch 2009 article.
Excellent

Students exhibited a strong ability to relate the information in their assigned article to the Koch 2009 article.




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58