iRubric: Collection Analysis Paper Part A rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Collection Analysis Paper Part A

Rubric Code: N43W69

By GwenRich

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: (none)

Part A. Collection Development
	Poor 70 pts	Fair 80 pts	Good 90 pts	Excellent 100 pts
Resources: Identification 15 % Use the resources discussed in class ... to help select appropriate works	Poor Student does not demonstrate that the tools mentioned in class or in the readings were used to produce this paper.	Fair Student demonstrates use of some tools that were mentioned in class or in the readings.	Good Student demonstrates a good command of the tools mentioned in class or in the readings	Excellent Student goes above and beyond in demonstrating excellent command of tools mentioned in class or in the readings.
Resources: Working Independently 25 % Identify good selection resources that are appropriate to the collection being studied.	Poor Student either does not demonstrate use of resources beyond those discussed in class, or demonstrates use of resources that are not appropriate to the collection.	Fair Student demonstrates an attempt to identify resources beyond those discussed in class; they are appropriate to the collection.	Good Student demonstrates strength at identifying resources beyond those discussed in class; those resources are a good fit to the collection.	Excellent Student demonstrates real creativity and resourcefulness in identifying resources considerably beyond the scope of those discussed in class; those resources are themselves creative and compelling and add to the breadth of the reader's mental universe.
Process: Analysis 25 % Describe the process followed to analyze the collection, and give your conclusions.	Poor The collection analysis process is inadequately described and/or there are no conclusions about the analysis stated.	Fair The collection analysis process and/or conclusions about the analysis are touched upon, but not explained much.	Good The collection analysis process and conclusions about the analysis are presented in detail.	Excellent Student demonstrates exceptional analytic and descriptive skills in relating the collection analysis process and conclusions.
Process: Discovery and Selection 25 % Describe the process you used to discover and select the works.	Poor The discovery and selection process is either inadequately described or not at all, making it difficult for the reader to understand the student's thought processes.	Fair The discovery and selection process is covered briefly, but with insufficient detail for the reader to understand the student's rationale in making his or her decisions.	Good The discovery and selection process is presented in detail so that the reader is able to understand the student's rationale for his or her decisions.	Excellent The student demonstrates that she or he used real creativity in discovering new works for the collection and rationalizing their inclusion.
Mechanics Section
	Poor 80 pts	Fair 90 pts	Good 100 pts	(N/A)
Appendix 5 % Provide an appendix including complete information on works selected (see syllabus for specific contents).	Poor The appendix is included in the page count of the narrative portion of the paper and/or is generally not done according to instructions.	Fair The information in the appendix is presented according to instructions, but is only partially complete (for example, the author and title are listed but not the publisher).	Good The appendix is comprehensive and completed as per all requirements in the syllabus.	N/A
Cosmetics 5 % Covers the cosmetic or stylistic facets of the paper.	Poor The paper has one or more of the following issues: (1) lots of typographical errors reflecting failure to proofread (2) does not meet minimum page requirements (3) Citations have not been provided for quoted material as necessary.	Fair Some issues with typographical errors and/or general proofreading are apparent; there are a few issues with citations but in general, the information the reader needs is there.	Good The paper has been proofread carefully and the author cites the work of other authors appropriately.	N/A

Keywords:

Library science

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric