iRubric: Practicum self assessment rubric

The teacher was NOT contacted prior to the visit.

The teacher WAS contacted prior to the visit, BUT no proof of the contact was provided.
(Note: your instructor will follow up with each practicum teacher to ensure this took place.)

The teacher WAS contacted prior to the visit, AND proof of the contact was provided (i.e. copy of sent email, teacher signature acknowledging phone conversation, etc.)

Professional demeanor was noticeably lacking, including a lack of appropriate attire, arriving late, not staying for the duration of the practicum experience, etc. (Note: your instructor will follow up with each practium teacher for this purpose.)

Professional demeanor was appropriately demonstrated by wearing appropriate attire (i.e. khakis, tennis shoes), arriving on time, staying for the duration of the practicum experience, etc. (Note: your instructor will follow up with each practicum teacher for this purpose.)

Professional demeanor was exceedingly well demonstrated. The practicum student wore highly professional attire (i.e. dress slacks, dress shoes, jacket and/or tie where appropriate), arrived PRIOR TO the scheduled time, stayed for the duration of the practicum experience, etc. (Note: your instructor will follow up with each practicum teacher for this purpose.)

The observed teaching strategy was minimally detailed and/or simply listed. Little to no explanation was given regarding WHY the strategy would be particularly useful in the practicum student's future classroom.

The observed teaching strategy was adequately explained. Some explanation was given regarding WHY the strategy would be particularly useful in the practicum student's future classroom, BUT the reasoning isn't entirely clear. The reviewer has some lingering questions about the strategy observed.

The explanation of the observed teaching strategy is highly detailed. A succinct explanation clearly states WHY the strategy would be particularly useful in the practicum student's future classroom, AND the reasoning is quite clear. The reviewer has NO lingering questions about the strategy observed.