iRubric: Missouri FCCLA Healthy AgriMissouri Meals rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Missouri FCCLA Healthy AgriMissouri Meals

This rubric is for the Missouri FCCLA state contest, Healthy AgriMissouri Meals. The contest is open to Missouri FCCLA members only. Information found at www.mofccla.org

Rubric Code: N38B66

By MoFCCLA

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Vocational

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

MoFCCLA Healthy AgriMissouri Meals Recognizes participants who use FCS knowledge and skills to develop a healthy menu using AgriMissouri food products.
	0 pts	1 pts	2 pts	3 pts	4 pts
Project Identification Page 1 pts	0 ( x 1 pts) Not included.	1 ( x 1 pts) Included but missing one or more requirements	2 ( x 1 pts) DO NOT USE	3 ( x 1 pts) DO NOT USE	4 ( x 1 pts) Includes participant name(s), school, city, state, FCCLA region,name of event, and event category.
Use of FCCLA Planning Process 1 pts	0 ( x 1 pts) Not included.	1 ( x 1 pts) 1 or 2 steps summarized. Planning process relationship to project is weak.	2 ( x 1 pts) 3 of 5 steps summarized. Planning process results are generally reflected in project.	3 ( x 1 pts) 4 of 5 steps summarized. Planning process results are seen in project.	4 ( x 1 pts) All 5 steps summarized. Planning process completed and relates to project.
AgriMissouri Benefits Page 1 pts Provide information on economic, ecologic, health and/or community advantages of purchasing AgriMissouri products.	0 ( x 1 pts) Not included.	1 ( x 1 pts) Attempts to address topic, but very unclear or provides minimal or no support.	2 ( x 1 pts) Takes position but lacks development in parts or is repetitive.	3 ( x 1 pts) Takes clear position and supports it with relevant reasons and/or examples.	4 ( x 1 pts) Takes clear position and consistently supports it with well-chosen reasons and/or examples; is persuasive and compelling.
Family Case Study Analysis 1 pts Introduction and assumptions made based on family case study.	0 ( x 1 pts) Not included.	1 ( x 1 pts) Analysis is restatement of family case study and does not demonstrate critical thinking	2 ( x 1 pts) Analysis does not reflect critical thinking and or does not provide realistic assumptions regarding possible family needs.	3 ( x 1 pts) Analysis reflects understanding of possible family and dietary needs.	4 ( x 1 pts) Analysis demonstrates critical thinking regarding possible family needs and assumptions made are realistic and believable. Assumptions are realistic, believable, and supported by data provided.
Daily Menu - Day 1 1 pts	0 ( x 1 pts) Not included.	1 ( x 1 pts) Nutritional meals were not generally met. Less than 3 different AgriMissouri products were included. Breakfast, lunch, dinner, dessert/snacks and beverages were not included for each day.	2 ( x 1 pts) Daily Menu generally meets the family nutritional needs, 3 or more different AgriMissouri products are included. Breakfast, lunch, dinner, dessert/snacks, and beverages are included.	3 ( x 1 pts) Daily menu meets the nutritional needs of each family member. 3 or more different AgriMissouri products are included. Breakfast, lunch, dinner, dessert/snacks, and beverages are included.	4 ( x 1 pts) DO NOT USE.
Daily Menu - Day 2 1 pts	0 ( x 1 pts) Not included.	1 ( x 1 pts) Nutritional meals were not generally met. Less than 3 different AgriMissouri products were included. Breakfast, lunch, dinner, dessert/snacks and beverages were not included for each day.	2 ( x 1 pts) Daily Menu generally meets the family nutritional needs, 3 or more different AgriMissouri products are included. Breakfast, lunch, dinner, dessert/snacks, and beverages are included.	3 ( x 1 pts) Daily menu meets the nutritional needs of each family member. 3 or more different AgriMissouri products are included. Breakfast, lunch, dinner, dessert/snacks, and beverages are included.	4 ( x 1 pts) DO NOT USE.
Nutritional Analysis Chart - Day 1 1 pts	0 ( x 1 pts) Not included.	1 ( x 1 pts) Nutritional analysis chart is incomplete.	2 ( x 1 pts) Nutritional analysis chart is complete; accurate per daily menus; mostly meets nutritional needs of each family case study member.	3 ( x 1 pts) Nutritional analysis chart is complete; accurate per daily menus; meets nutritional needs of each family case study member.	4 ( x 1 pts) DO NOT USE.
Nutritional Analysis Chart - Day 2 1 pts	0 ( x 1 pts) Not included	1 ( x 1 pts) Nutritional analysis chart is incomplete.	2 ( x 1 pts) Nutritional analysis chart is complete; accurate per daily menus; mostly meets nutritional needs of each family case study member.	3 ( x 1 pts) Nutritional analysis chart is complete; accurate per daily menus; meets nutritional needs of each family case study member.	4 ( x 1 pts) DO NOT USE.
Menu Variety Analysis 1 pts	0 ( x 1 pts) Not included	1 ( x 1 pts) Menu chosen does not provide variety in texture, color, flavor, shape, and temperature.	2 ( x 1 pts) Menu chosen illustrated average variety in texture, color, flavor, shape, and temperature.	3 ( x 1 pts) Menu chosen illustrated good variety in texture, color, flavor, shape, and temperature.	4 ( x 1 pts) DO NOT USE.
AgriMissouri Product Information 1 pts	0 ( x 1 pts) Not included	1 ( x 1 pts) Less than 3 pages, does not include all required information and does not address each AgriMissouri product.	2 ( x 1 pts) 3-6 pages including basic information about some of the AgriMissouri products used.	3 ( x 1 pts) 4-6 pages including characteristics, information, and purchasing information for all AgriMissouri products.	4 ( x 1 pts) 6 pages including unique characteristics and detailed information on how to obtain are included for all 6 AgriMissouri products.
Project Summary/Rationale 1 pts	0 ( x 1 pts) Not included	1 ( x 1 pts) Project summary/rationale is weak and does not explain choices.	2 ( x 1 pts) Provided some support for choices made to meet case study. Some choices were questionable and/or not explained adequately.	3 ( x 1 pts) Provided support for choices made to meet case study needs. Choices explained.	4 ( x 1 pts) Provided strong support for choices made to meet case study needs. Choices defended/explained adequately.
Grammar 1 pts Spelling, Punctuation and Capitalization	0 ( x 1 pts) Extensive errors (6 or more)	1 ( x 1 pts) Some errors (4-5)	2 ( x 1 pts) Few errors (1-3)	3 ( x 1 pts) No errors.	4 ( x 1 pts) DO NOT USE
Subject Knowledge 1 pts	0 ( x 1 pts) Subject knowledge is not evident.	1 ( x 1 pts) Subject knowledge is not evident, information is confusing, incorrect or insufficient.	2 ( x 1 pts) Subject knowledge is evident, but information is confusing or insufficient.	3 ( x 1 pts) Subject knowledge is evident, most information is clear, appropriate and accurate.	4 ( x 1 pts) Subject knowledge is clearly evident. All information is clear, appropriate and accurate.
Documentation 1 pts	0 ( x 1 pts) No information provided on copyright or source citations.	1 ( x 1 pts) Copyright is questionable, sources are not properly cited.	2 ( x 1 pts) DO NOT USE	3 ( x 1 pts) Copyright statements are permissions are included, most sources are properly cited.	4 ( x 1 pts) Work is original, or copyright statements and permissions are included, all sources are documented.

Keywords:

Missouri, FCCLA, nutrition, meals

Subjects:

Vocational

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric