Skip to main content
iRubric: clinical presentation rubric

iRubric: clinical presentation rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Electrotheraputic modalities :clinical applications Dr.Azza attia
Rubric Code: N2W7252
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric clinical presentation
  Strong

4 pts

Acceptable

3 pts

Needs improvement

2 pts

Unsatisfactory

1 pts

Introduction and Background

........................../4

Strong

Intervention selected is clear. Strong introduction. Background explains the interest in the intervention and what has been done or has changed in the history of the practice/intervention
Acceptable

Intervention selected is clear. Introduction limitedly compelling. Background explains the interesting the intervention and the history
Needs improvement

Intervention selected is initially unclear or difficult to identify quickly. Introduction is not well organized or not compelling. Background is limited.
Unsatisfactory

Intervention selected is unclear. Introduction is poorly organized and not enough information is given to explain the background.
PICO Question

......................../4

Strong

Proper Identification
of the Problem with good PICO question
Acceptable

incomplete PICO question
Needs improvement

improper PICO question
Unsatisfactory

No PICO question
Synthesis of evidence

......................../4

Strong

Current research articles are discussed in cohesive manner, and well organized to present the findings supporting the discussion
Acceptable

Research articles are presented but lack organization to synthesize the information well
Needs improvement

Research articles are limitedly presented and not well synthesized. Articles do not completely relate to discussion
Unsatisfactory

Research articles were not synthesized and/or did not specifically relate to policy or discussion.
Compare and contrast evidance

.........................../4

Strong

Elements are discussed with in depth evaluation comparing and contrasting the practice observed, policy, and evidence
Acceptable

The discussion comparing and contrasting the practice and evidence is presented but not in depth
Needs improvement

The discussion is missing key elements of the compare and contrast discussion, not linking evidence well to practice.
Unsatisfactory

The compare and contrast discussion is limited, poorly related to the other elements of the paper and/or missing
Challenges and Conclusions

.........................../4

Strong

Challenges are presented related to the evidence and the practice with suggestions for improving practices and/or the purpose of continuing to use current evidence based practice.Strong conclusion
Acceptable

Challenges are presented, but there are limited or no suggestions about the intervention. Conclusion summarizes findings
Needs improvement

Challenges are presented, but there are limited or no suggestions about the intervention. The conclusion is limited or lacking a link to the discussion.
Unsatisfactory

Challenges are not discussed. Conclusions are not supported by the rest of the writing in the paper.




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16