Skip to main content

iRubric: Radioactive Isotope-A RAFT rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Radioactive Isotope-A RAFT 
Radioactive Isotopes are used regularly in medical treatments.  Some people feel that they are necessary in the testing and treatment of patients.  Others feel that there are better ways to practice medicine. Your job is to choose to represent either a pharmaceutical company [ Neodymium Pharmaceuticals ] that specializes in the uses of radioactive isotopes for testing and treatment or a homeopathic company [ Terra Medications ] that focuses on natural forms of testing and treatment.  
Rubric Code: MXWA38X
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Radioactive Isotope Pamphlet
  Distinguished

A deep and board understanding of the required knowledge and skills. There is outstanding evidence of inferential thinking, analysis, and synthesis. Original, high quality work goes above and beyond defined requirements. The student know this concept or skill well enough to be able to teach it to someone else.

4 pts

Proficient

A good general understanding of the required knowledge and skills, and the ability to apply them in different situations. There is sufficient evidence of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation where appropriate.

3 pts

Approaching

An approaching understanding of the required knowledge and skills, and an ability to apply them with support at times. Evidence is inconsistent and/or misconceptions prevent the student from understanding the essential question or big idea in the content.

2 pts

Limited

A limited understanding of the knowledge and skills. There is inadequate evidence to determine proficiency.

1.5 pts

No Evidence

Minimal to no achievement in terms of the required knowledge and skills. There is little to no evidence to determine proficiency.

0 pts

Attractiveness & Organization

Distinguished

The brochure has exceptionally attractive formatting & well-organized information.(professional look, could be in a doctors office)
Proficient

The brochure has attractive formatting & well-organized information. (Looks neat but needs minor work in order to be in a doctors office)
Approaching

The brochure has well-organized information.
Limited

The brochure’s formatting & organization are confusing to the reader.
No Evidence
Graphics /Pictures

Distinguished

Graphics go well with the text and there is a good mix of text and graphics.
Graphics are at an appropriate size and compliment the text.
Pamphlet has 4 or more images.
Proficient

Graphics go well with the text, and there are not so many that they distract from the text.
Graphics are at an appropriate size and/or compliments the text.
Pamphlet has 2-4 images.
Approaching

Brochure seems “text-heavy", graphics are not an appropriate size and/or doesn't compliment the text.
Pamphlet has 2 images.
Limited

Graphics do not go with the accompanying text or appear to be randomly chosen.
Pamphlet has 1 to no images.
No Evidence
Content/ Accuracy

Distinguished

Effectively distinguishes claim from alternate or opposing claims.
Logically sequences claims, counterclaims reasons and evidence to enhance the pamphlet.
Student has a deep and broad understanding of isotopes, radioactive isotopes, uses in the medical field, and the homeopathic alternatives. Reads like a professional in the field created the brochure.
Proficient

Distinguishes claim from alternate or opposing claims well.
Has a sequence of claims, counterclaims reasons and evidence to enhance the pamphlet.
Student has a good general understanding of isotopes, radioactive isotopes, uses in the medical field, and the homeopathic alternatives. The content in the brochure could be used to inform people in a doctors office.
Approaching

Somewhat distinguishes claim from alternate or opposing claims well. Needs work.
Has no sequence of claims, counterclaims reasons and evidence to enhance the pamphlet.
Student has an approaching understanding of isotopes, radioactive isotopes, uses in the medical field, and the homeopathic alternatives. Student has some misconceptions and/or lacking some content knowledge.
Limited

Somewhat distinguishes claim from alternate or opposing claims well. Needs work.
Has no sequence of claims, counterclaims reasons and evidence to enhance the pamphlet.
Student has a limited understanding of the knowledge and skills of isotopes, radioactive isotopes, uses in the medical field, and the homeopathic alternatives.
No Evidence
Support

Distinguished

The text has an abundant amount of support on the author's stance, the facts, and supporting their claim using the opposing side's options for the same test/treatment.
Has 5 or more well written paragraph panels.
Proficient

The text has adequate, but complete, support on the author's stance, the facts, and/or supporting their claim using the opposing side's options for the same test/treatment.
Has 5 paragraph panels some paragraphs could use some work or use more text.
Approaching

The text has some support on the author's stance, the facts, and/or supporting their claim using the opposing side's options for the same test/treatment.
Has 3-4 paragraph panels.
Limited

The text has very little/no support on the author's stance, the facts, and/or supporting their claim using the opposing side's options.
Has 1-3 paragraph panels.
No Evidence
Completeness

Distinguished

This brochure has all the required information and some additional information. The student has gone above and beyond the defined requirements. The student knows this concept well enough to be able to tach it to someone else.
Proficient

The brochure has all the required information.
There is sufficient evidence of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of the content.
Approaching

The brochure has some of the required information.
Evidence is inconsistent and/or misconceptions prevent the student from understanding the essential content.
Limited

The brochure has little of the required information.
There is inadequate evidence to determine proficiency.
No Evidence
Spelling & Grammar

Distinguished

No spelling or grammar errors appear on the brochure.
Proficient

No more than one spelling or grammar error appears.
Approaching

Up to three spelling or grammar errors appear.
Limited

Several spelling and/or grammar errors appear in your brochure.
No Evidence



Keywords:
  • Radioactive Isotope Uses in Medicine Agree or Disagree


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224