Skip to main content
iRubric: Veterinary Expert Team Collaboration rubric

iRubric: Veterinary Expert Team Collaboration rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Veterinary Expert Team Collaboration 
Veterinary Assistant students collaborate and host an "Ask the Expert" on chosen skeletal disease/disorders
Rubric Code: MXC8833
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Medical  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Skeletal Disease/Disorder
  Limited evidence

1 pts

Below Expectation

2 pts

Approaching Expectation

3 pts

Meets Expectation

4 pts

Feedback

(N/A)

Presentation

Communication

Limited evidence

The oral presentation was inarticulate and difficult to follow. Poor delivery and timing of information. Did not seem to know the material. Poor synthesis of bone functionality to disease/disorder.
Below Expectation

The oral presentation was choppy, difficult to follow. Presenters did not have a grasp on the information. Frequent pauses for him or her to find their place. Too much reading. Needs more synthesizing of bone functionality to disease/disorder.
Approaching Expectation

The oral presentation was mostly smooth and seamless, few verbal pauses. The presenter appeared calm, had a general grasp of information.<BR>
Proficient delivery and timing of information. Proficient synthesis of bone functionality to disease/disorder.
Meets Expectation

The oral presentation was smooth and seamless. The presenter appeared calm and in command of the information. Exceptional delivery. Exceptional synthesis of bone functionality to disease/disorder.
Feedback
Clarity

Application

Limited evidence

The electronic presentation were completely unrelated to the topic being discussed and/or were unintelligible. No images or link for Pinterest. Presentation needs to be more logical and organized.
Below Expectation

The electronic presentation were difficult to understand and difficult to read. Few images utilized link for Pinterest was present but the pin was empty. Information at times did not seem to be related to the topic being discussed.
Approaching Expectation

The electronic presentation were somewhat organized. Included some appropriate images, clear and medium font. Pinterest link was present, the pin had some collage items but not all members contributed. The information contained generally applied to the topic being discussed.
Meets Expectation

The electronic presentation were clear and understandable. Slides exceptionally detailed, organized, logical; includes images & large font. Pinterest link was present and every member had three pins per member. The information contained was directly applicable to the topic being discussed.
Feedback
Completeness

Thinking/Inquiry

Limited evidence

The presentation included none of the applicable components related to the topic of the presentation. Lack of critical or analytical thought and little to no insight utilized.
Below Expectation

The presentation included some of the applicable, critical components related to the topic of presentation. More details, insight, and critical thought needed.
Approaching Expectation

The presentation included most of the applicable components related to the topic of the presentation. Proficient critical analysis of issue and impact using many details and evidence. Moderate insight into issue.
Meets Expectation

The presentation included all of the applicable components related to the topic of the presentation. Exceptional insight into critical components & analysis of issue.
Feedback
Knowledge

Understanding of material

Limited evidence

The presenter failed to identify required components. Presentation of material was unclear and not related to the topic at hand. Heavy reliance on notes during presentation. Failed to provide detail on the disease process, treatment decisions, and other components to the project.
Below Expectation

The presenter identified each component required of the presentation. Issue explained with some accuracy, needs more details. The discussion of material was unclear and difficult to understand. Needs less reliance on notes. Gave very rudimentary detail on the disease process, treatment decisions, and other components to the project.
Approaching Expectation

The presenter identified each component contained in the presentation. The material presented in each section was clear but not comprehensive. Utilized many details and sources. Some reliance on notes. Provided strong background theory on the disease, treatment decisions, and some of the other components to the project but did not explain in full detail.
Meets Expectation

The presenter identified each component required of the presentation. Knowledge of material is concise, exceptionally accurate, and clearly explained. Little to no reliance on notes. Explained in detail the theory behind the disease progression, many of the treatment decisions, and all components to Part 1-3 are complete.
Feedback



Keywords:
  • oral presentation

Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16