iRubric: ENGR 315 Demonstration Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

ENGR 315 Demonstration Rubric

Rubric to assess ENGR 315 design project demonstrations.

Rubric Code: MXC692X

By ryansmith

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Engineering

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Objectives 30 % Assessment of 4 Objectives for the project.
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Objective 1 25 % C R I T E R I O N	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Objective 2 25 % C R I T E R I O N	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Objective 3 25 % C R I T E R I O N	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Objective 4 25 % C R I T E R I O N	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Functions 20 % Two functions of the project
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Function 1 50 % C R I T E R I O N	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Function 2 50 % C R I T E R I O N	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Constraints 40 % Four constraints for the project
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Constraint 1 25 % C R I T E R I O N	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Constraint 2 25 % C R I T E R I O N	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Constraint 3 25 % C R I T E R I O N	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Constraint 4 25 % C R I T E R I O N	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Expert Assessment 10 % A few criteria assessed by the observer
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Operational Prototype 40 % Assessment on the operation of the presented prototype.	Poor Presented Prototype does not work	Fair Some components of prototype work	Good Most components work, but one or two things not completely finished.	Excellent 100% working and finished prototype
Followed Design Process 40 % Assessment on how well the formal design process was followed throughout the semester.	Poor No design process followed at all	Fair Followed the design process for some aspects.	Good Clear that the design process was followed. Some areas where implementation could have been improved. Some ad hoc decisions made, or process not fully documented.	Excellent Design process followed and documented for all aspects of the design process.
Team contribution 10 % Assessment on the contribution of all team members on the project.	Poor No team cooperation. Single person contributions.	Fair Most team members contributed, albeit disproportionate. Lack of cohesion.	Good Most team members contributed equally.	Excellent All team members contributed equally to the project.
Aesthetic 10 % Assessment on the presentation of the prototype.	Poor Prototype is not presentable, or not complete.	Fair Prototype is complete, but little thought was put into aesthetics.	Good Prototype is presentable, but lacks fine details of aesthetic appearance.	Excellent Prototype is presentable to the outside world.