Skip to main content
iRubric: VEX Robot Design rubric

iRubric: VEX Robot Design rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
VEX Robot Design 
This rubric will be used to assess the overall design of a student's or group of students' robot that is going to be built with VEX Robotics parts. This does not include the sketch or CAD drawing of the robot. This deals with group functionality and project management as pertains to the design of the group's project.
Rubric Code: MX98C6B
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Robot Design Rubric
  Excellent

20 pts

Good

18 pts

Fair

15 pts

Poor

5 pts

Group Dynamics

Excellent

Group follows good meeting and teamwork procedures. Discussion remains professional in tone and direction. Discussion proceeds efficiently. Group is able to focus on the relevant aspects of the robot.
Good

Group follows decent meeting and teamwork procedures. Discussion remains professional in tone and direction. For the most part discussion proceeds efficiently. For the most part group focuses on relevant aspect of robot designs.
Fair

Group follows few meeting and teamwork procedures. Discussion does not have a professional tone or manner. Discussion does not proceed efficiently. Group rarely focuses on relevant aspects of robot design.
Poor

Group does not work as a team. Little discussion occurs. Discussion does not stay on topic. Group does not focus on relevant aspects of robot design.
Decision Making

Excellent

Group members avoid unnecessary “attachment” to their designs that gets in the way of productive discussion. All group member are able to reach consensus.
Good

Group members avoid unnecessary “attachment” to their designs that gets in the way of productive discussion. Most group members are able to reach a consensus.
Fair

Group member must keep pieces of their original design which may temporarily halt productive discussion. Few group members reach consensus.
Poor

Group members feel that their design is the only design. Group members never reach consensus.
Project Progress

Excellent

Project shows a clear progression beyond what was available at the time of proposal. Every team member has effectively contributed to development. Decisions show evidence of a thoughtful decision-making process. Group has given appropriate consideration to all aspects of development, including mechanics, programming, and testing.
Good

Project has progressed from what was available at time of proposal. Most team members have effectively contributed to development. Most decisions show evidence of use of a thoughtful decision-making process. Group has spent some time considering all aspects of development.
Fair

Project has made only fair progression beyond what was available at the time of proposal. Few team members have effectively contributed to development. Decisions were made without using a decision-making process. Group has spent little time considering all aspects of development.
Poor

Project has not progressed from time of proposal. Little contribution from any team member. No clear decisions made. Group did not consider all aspects of development.
Construction

Excellent

The robot is free-standing. The joints are strong and effective. All screws are tight and the overall robot is built solid.
Good

The robot can stand by itself, the joints are effective, all but a few screw are tight.
Fair

The robot is unstable, parts are falling off and joints are poorly formed.
Poor

The robot cannot stand by itself, it is not assembled correctly or completed.
Visual

Excellent

The robot is eye catching and care was taken when designing and building the robot.
Good

there has been clear effort to make the robot look well built and function well.
Fair

There was some effort to make the robot look nice. But could use more work.
Poor

The robot is not eye catching or neatly made.
Design

Excellent

The robot is very close to the design, any minor changes are listed with solid reasoning.
Good

the robot is true to the design, with minor changes/adaptations to suit specific needs which are listed.
Fair

The robot is loosely resembles the design, with significant differences for specific reasons.
Poor

The robot is nothing like its design, with no reason given.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16