iRubric: Compound Vocab Frayer rubric

Terms were spelled correctly. Definitions were accurate, pertained to how the term is being used in class and composed in the student's own words.

Terms were spelled correctly. Description/definitions were quoted directly from a dictionary source and the student is able to understand and explain the quoted definition.

Terms may or may not have been spelled correctly. Descriptions/definitions were incomplete or missing, or a quoted definition is not used in the context of the class and/or cannot be explained by the student.

Additional terms description/definition accurate and composed in student's own words.

All terms have a correct non-example or diagram of a non-example

2/3 the terms have non-examples/ diagrams OR some of the non-examples/diagrams of non-examples are incorrect

Less than 1/2 of the terms have correct non-examples/diagrams of non-examples

There are non-examples/diagrams of non-examples for all additional terms.

Information on chart is neat and legible. Terminology and definitions are organized correctly. The paper is neat and in good condition.

Information is mostly neat and legible. Organization may suffer. Legibility or neatness may suffer. The paper is neat and in good condition.

Information is messy and/or illegible. Organization strategies are absent. The paper may also be in poor condition. Words are listed on paper and defined, instead of on a Frayer.