iRubric: APP Scientific Reporting rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

APP Scientific Reporting

This rubric is for the daily grading of scientific method of reporting.

Rubric Code: MX24X74

By a_brown

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

APP Scientific Reportiong
	Unacceptable 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Good 2 pts	Excellent 3 pts
Topic	Unacceptable No summary provided.	Poor Summary contains grammatical errors. Insufficient background information. Does not sufficiently address potential challenges.	Good Summary contains no grammatical errors. Background summary explained. History addressed. Challenges addressed.	Excellent Summary contains no grammatical errors. Background summary contains significant information on the topic. Summary provides significant historical depth. Challenges are addressed in significant detail.
Bibliography	Unacceptable No bibliography provided.	Poor Bibliography not in MLA format or not complete.	Good Complete bibliography. MLA format errors.	Excellent Complete bibliography. No MLA errors.
Problem Statement	Unacceptable No problem statement provided.	Poor Problem statement not in the form of a question.	Good Problem statement in the form of a question but does not adequately address the objective.	Excellent Problem statement is in the form of a question and addresses the objective.
Hypothesis	Unacceptable No hypothesis provided.	Poor Hypothesis does not address the problem statement nor does it offer a resolution for the problem.	Good Hypothesis postulates an outcome but does not address the problem statement or summary.	Excellent Hypothesis postulates an outcome by addressing the summary, problem statement and proposes an outcome.
Experiment Design	Unacceptable Variables and materials not addressed.	Poor Variables not complete, materials not listed.	Good Variables complete and materials listed. Needs more information.	Excellent Variables are well thought out. Materials list is complete.
Results	Unacceptable Data not collected.	Poor Data collected is incomplete. Narrative does not communicate data.	Good Data collected is complete. Narrative does not effectively communicate data.	Excellent Data collected is complete. Narrative effectively communicates data.
Conclusion	Unacceptable Conclusion not provided.	Poor Conclusion incomplete. Does not answer all the questions posed.	Good Conclusion complete. Questions answered but require more depth of information.	Excellent Conclusion complete. Questions answered in detail. Evidence presented supports or disproves hypothesis.
Extension	Unacceptable Extension not provided.	Poor Improvements do not address the issues in the experiment.	Good Improvements suggested. Suggestions need to be more specific.	Excellent Improvements suggested. Includes specific proposals to improve the investigation in the future.
Application	Unacceptable No application provided.	Poor Application suggested but not explained. Questions not answered.	Good Application suggested, questions answered but more depth of explanation required.	Excellent Application suggested. Suggestion supported by findings. Questions answered in depth.
Abstract	Unacceptable No abstract provided.	Poor Abstract contains significant grammatical errors. Does not include all the components of the experiment. Bibliography not edited. Does not satisfy the length requirement.	Good Abstract contains some grammatical errors. Some the aspects of the experiment not covered. Bibliography edited correctly. Abstract satisfies the length requirement and does an adequate job explaining the experiment.	Excellent Abstract is clear and does not contain any grammatical errors. All aspects of the investigation are addressed. Bibliography edited correctly and additions made.

Subjects:

Science

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric