iRubric: Final Buffet Project rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Final Buffet Project

Working within a defined flavor profile, teams develop a collection of distinctive pastry products. Create accurate recipes, production schedules, costing analysis, and shelf stability studies. Gather this information into a portfolio to be submitted along with the project. Display your products in a creative, grand buffet with chocolate centerpiece

Rubric Code: MX24A24

By marchaymon

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Entremet Evaluation 15 % Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Average 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Entremet Presentation 4 pts	Poor Sloppy Finish/Glaze (too thick or thin, has drip marks or bubbles, not shiny) Improperly cut/portioned Careless Presentation (messy, fingerprints, etc)	Average Acceptable Finish/Glaze, may have some inconsistencies that affect overall appearance Properly cut/portioned Presentation is adequate	Good Good overall finish (might be too thick or too thin) Properly Cut/Portioned Attractive Presentation	Excellent Excellent Finish/Glaze Properly Cut/Portioned Attractive Presentation
Entremet Flavor 4 pts Enter description	Poor Muted flavor or poor distribution of flavors means that some flavors dominate Finished product is not interesting	Average Good overall flavor, but could benefit from more carefully considered contrast Good use of ingredients	Good Good overall flavor Thoughtful distribution of flavors contributes to contrast Good use of ingredients	Excellent Excellent overall flavor Well integrated, demonstrates carefully considered contrast Imaginative use and distribution of ingredients
Entremet Texture/Mouthfeel 4 pts Enter description	Poor Textures do not blend properly, or too much repetition and little contrast Cake is dense or dry Gummy or grainy components Poor eatability	Average Good overall textural contrast, but components are not carefully distributed Eatability concerns	Good Good overall textural contrast, but components are not carefully distributed Good eatability	Excellent Textures are interesting, contrast well and are carefully distributed Excellent eatability
Entremet Construction 4 pts	Poor Poorly constructed Layers are too thick, uneven, or fall apart Careless application of glaze	Average Construction is adequate, but one or more layers is not even or level Glaze is carefully applied	Good Carefully constructed, but one layer is not even or level Glaze is carefully applied	Excellent Carefully constructed, all layers are even and level Glaze is expertly applied
Entremet Decor 4 pts	Poor Decor items are unfinished Poor workmanship Clumsy application Show little imagination or integration	Average Decor items show good workmanship Application of decor items is inconsistent Shows some imagination and integration	Good Decor items show good workmanship Application of decor items is consistent Shows good imagination and integration	Excellent Decor items show excellent workmanship Application of decor items is consistent Shows excellent imagination and integration
PG/Cake Variation 11 %
	Poor 1 pts	Average 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
PG/Cake Variation Flavor 4 pts	Poor Poor distribution of flavors means that some flavors dominate Finished product is not interesting Poor use of ingredients	Average Good overall flavor, but could benefit from more carefully considered contrast Good use of ingredients	Good Good overall flavor Thoughtful distribution of flavors contributes to contrast Good use of ingredients	Excellent Excellent overall flavor Well integrated, demonstrates carefully considered contrast Imaginative use and distribution of ingredients
PG/Cake Variation Texture 4 pts	Poor Textures do not blend properly, or too much repetition and little contrast Cake is dense or dry Gummy or grainy components Poor eatability	Average Good overall textural contrast, but components are not carefully distributed Eatability concerns	Good Good overall textural contrast, but components are not carefully distributed Good eatability	Excellent Textures are interesting, contrast well and are carefully distributed Excellent eatability
PG/Cake Variation Presentation 4 pts	Poor Poor workmanship and/or construction Decor items are unfinished and/or inconsistently applied Show little imagination	Average Good overall workmanship Decor is adequate Application of decor items is consistent Shows some imagination	Good Carefully constructed Decor items show good workmanship Application of decor items is consistent Shows good imagination	Excellent Carefully constructed Decor items show excellent workmanship Application of decor items is consistent Shows excellent imagination
Verrine 11 %
	Poor 1 pts	Average 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Verrine Flavor 1 pts	Poor Poor distribution of flavors means that some flavors dominate Finished product is not interesting Poor use of ingredients	Average Good overall flavor, but could benefit from more carefully considered contrast Good use of ingredients	Good Good overall flavor Thoughtful distribution of flavors contributes to contrast Good use of ingredients	Excellent Excellent overall flavor Well integrated, demonstrates carefully considered contrast Imaginative use and distribution of ingredients
Verrine Texture 1 pts	Poor Textures do not blend properly, or too much repetition and little contrast Poor Eatability	Average Good overall textural contrast, but components are not carefully distributed Eatability concerns	Good Good overall textural contrast, but components are not carefully distributed Good eatability	Excellent Textures are interesting, contrast well and are carefully distributed Excellent eatability
Verrine Presentation 1 pts	Poor Poor workmanship and/or construction Decor items are unfinished and/or inconsistently applied Show little imagination	Average Good overall workmanship Decor is adequate Application of decor items is consistent Shows some imagination	Good Carefully constructed Decor items show good workmanship Application of decor items is consistent Shows good imagination	Excellent Carefully constructed Decor items show excellent workmanship Application of decor items is consistent Shows excellent imagination
Contemporary Pastry 11 %
	Poor 1 pts	Average 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Contemporary Pastry Flavor 4 pts	Poor Poor distribution of flavors means that some flavors dominate Finished product is not interesting Poor use of ingredients	Average Good overall flavor, but could benefit from more carefully considered contrast Good use of ingredients	Good Good overall flavor Thoughtful distribution of flavors contributes to contrast Good use of ingredients	Excellent Excellent overall flavor Well integrated, demonstrates carefully considered contrast Imaginative use and distribution of ingredients
Contemporary Pastry Texture 4 pts	Poor Textures do not blend properly, or too much repetition and little contrast	Average Good overall textural contrast, but components are not carefully distributed Eatability concerns	Good Good overall textural contrast, but components are not carefully distributed Good eatability	Excellent Textures are interesting, contrast well and are carefully distributed Excellent eatability
Contemporary Pasty Presentation 4 pts	Poor Poor workmanship and/or construction Decor items are unfinished and/or inconsistently applied Show little imagination	Average Good overall workmanship Decor is adequate Application of decor items is consistent Shows some imagination	Good Carefully constructed Decor items show good workmanship Application of decor items is consistent Shows good imagination	Excellent Carefully constructed Decor items show excellent workmanship Application of decor items is consistent Shows excellent imagination
Classic Pastry 11 %
	Poor 1 pts	Average 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Classic Pastry Flavor 4 pts	Poor Poor distribution of flavors means that some flavors dominate Finished product is not interesting Poor use of ingredients	Average Good overall flavor, but could benefit from more carefully considered contrast Good use of ingredients	Good Good overall flavor Thoughtful distribution of flavors contributes to contrast Good use of ingredients	Excellent Excellent overall flavor Well integrated, demonstrates carefully considered contrast Imaginative use and distribution of ingredients
Classic Pastry Texture 4 pts	Poor Textures do not blend properly, or too much repetition and little contrast	Average Good overall textural contrast, but components are not carefully distributed Eatability concerns	Good Good overall textural contrast, but components are not carefully distributed Good eatability	Excellent Textures are interesting, contrast well and are carefully distributed Excellent eatability
Classic Pastry Presentation 4 pts	Poor Poor workmanship and/or construction Decor items are unfinished and/or inconsistently applied Show little imagination	Average Good overall workmanship Decor is adequate Application of decor items is consistent Shows some imagination	Good Carefully constructed Decor items show good workmanship Application of decor items is consistent Shows good imagination	Excellent Carefully constructed Decor items show excellent workmanship Application of decor items is consistent Shows excellent imagination
Frozen Dessert 11 %
	Poor 1 pts	Average 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Frozen Dessert Flavor 3 pts	Poor Poor distribution of flavors means that some flavors dominate Finished product is not interesting Poor use of ingredients	Average Good overall flavor, but could benefit from more carefully considered contrast Good use of ingredients	Good Good overall flavor Thoughtful distribution of flavors contributes to contrast Good use of ingredients	Excellent Excellent overall flavor Well integrated, demonstrates carefully considered contrast Imaginative use and distribution of ingredients
Frozen Dessert Texture 4 pts	Poor Textures do not blend properly, or too much repetition and little contrast Dessert formula is improperly balanced and is too hard or too soft	Average Good overall textural contrast, but components are not carefully distributed Eatability concerns	Good Good overall textural contrast, but components are not carefully distributed Good eatability	Excellent Textures are interesting, contrast well and are carefully distributed Excellent eatability
Frozen Dessert Presentation 4 pts	Poor Poor workmanship and/or construction Decor items are unfinished and/or inconsistently applied Show little imagination	Average Good overall workmanship Decor is adequate Application of decor items is consistent Shows some imagination	Good Carefully constructed Decor items show good workmanship Application of decor items is consistent Shows good imagination	Excellent Carefully constructed Decor items show excellent workmanship Application of decor items is consistent Shows excellent imagination
Showpiece 11 %
	Poor 1 pts	Average 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Design 4 pts	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Workmanship 4 pts	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Execution 4 pts	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
ePortfolio 20 %
	Poor 1 pts	Average 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Production Schedule 4 pts	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Costing Analysis 4 pts	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Graphics/Diagram/Descriptions 4 pts	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Recipes 4 pts	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Spelling/Grammar 4 pts	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric