iRubric: Primary Sources: Annotating, Summarizing, Analyzing rubric

One or more elements not attempted or completed

All elements attempted, but not all completed as instructed (citations or annotations missing, etc)

All elements completed well

No or very few relevant annotations. Not all systems represented, and no key as to what annotations correspond to which system

Passage is appropriately annotated, with relevant annotations. Most systems represented, and there is a key as to what annotations correspond to which system

Passage is richly annotated, with relevant and insightful annotations. All systems represented, and there is a key as to what annotations correspond to which system.

There is no analysis, or analysis is less than 1.5 pages long. Analysis makes no interpretive leap, may be almost entirely summary. No or inappropriate evidence is presented, and may not be appropriately cited.

There is an analysis, at least two pages long. Analysis makes some interpretive leaps, with little inappropriate summary. Reasoning behind analysis may be outlined. Some evidence is presented, and is appropriately cited.

The analysis, is around 3 pages long, and is thoughtful and insightful, making many interpretive leaps, with only the summary necessary to elaborate the point. Reasoning behind analysis is convincingly presented. Strong and creatively interpreted evidence support the analysis, all appropriately cited.