iRubric: Sociology Website rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Sociology Website

My personal rubric for websites pertaining to education in public and private schools as well as online. It helps assess the content of the websites and how informative they are.

Rubric Code: MCW874

By skalberson

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12

Web Evaluator
	Weak 5 pts	Average 10 pts	Above Average 15 pts	Excellent 20 pts
Visual Images, Graphics, Animations, Font and Videos.	Weak The website did not have any visual content. It lacked images and graphics to help animate it's content.	Average The website had some images but not as many graphics. The visuals were basic photo art with little animation.	Above Average This site had several images highlighting the content. It also included icons to every benchmark. The visuals were very interactive.	Excellent The website was highly visual. It included animated graphics, images and links to videos. It was memorable and highly interactive.
Creativity Format, Background Effects, Transitions, and Font.	Weak This site was low on creativity. It seemed plain and boring. It didn't offer enough visual content or links.	Average The site had some appealing aspects to it. It included an informing homepage, links and images. <BR> It showed partial creativity.	Above Average This site had very interesting features. It's visual and content were unique.	Excellent This site was highly creative. It featured interactive images, info, links and benchmarks. The content was very eye catching.
Content/Information Details, Ideas, References, Resources.	Weak The information was insufficient for the viewer to make any references. It didn't have any good content or reliable sources.	Average This contained some valuable information. It showed partial references with average content.	Above Average This site showed promising information. It's content was very helpful and accurate.	Excellent This site had every bit of information necessary. It's content was highly detailed. It showed everything that was offered vividly and informatively.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling	Weak Needs Improvement - Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that interfere with understanding. - Sentences are long and confusing or short and choppy with little variation.	Average Fair - Paper contains several grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors, but these do not interfere with understanding. - Sentences are long and confusing or short and choppy with little variation.	Above Average Good - Minor spelling, grammar, usage, and punctuation errors. - Sentences show attempt at varied structure.	Excellent Excellent - Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. - Sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Use of time in class Quality class time used for project	Weak The student wasted time in class and did little or no work on project and distracted others	Average Student used some time to work but still managed to waste time and distract others	Above Average Used the majority of the time given in class to work with some minor distractions	Excellent Used all class time given efficiently

Keywords:

Grades, Creativity, Access, Content, Students, Teachers, Parents

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric