iRubric: Collaborative Story Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Collaborative Story Project

Rubric Code: M78X83

By cnwatkins

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12, Graduate

Collaboration
	Excellent (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Poor (N/A)
Clarity of Group Expectations	Excellent The group was able to clarify and document what was expected of each group member	Fair The group was able to clarify was was expected of each group member, but did not document many of these expectations.	Poor The group did not clarify what was expected of each group member.
Contribution	Excellent Each group member met and exceeded the minimum expectations set by the teacher and the group.	Fair Each group member met the minimum expectations set by the teacher and the group.	Poor Group members did not meet the minimum expectations set by the teacher or the group.
Collaborative Short Story	Excellent All pre-writing elements have been completed and turned in on time. The tone, voice, and content of the story are representative of the group's personality and interests. The story includes the phrase, "It was completely unexpected." The story has a clear setting and point of view.	Fair All pre-writing elements have been completed and turned in on time. The tone, voice, and content of the story are consistant. "It was completely unexpected." The story has a setting and somewhat consistant point of view.	Poor Pre-writing elements were not completed OR were not turned in on time. The story is incomplete or absent.
Wiki Element
	Excellent (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Poor (N/A)
Links	Excellent Each story includes 5 or more links. There is a variety of important links that are well planned and creatively placed. Links include Internet, their own wiki, and classmates’ wikis.	Fair Each story includes 3-4 links. There is a variety of links, including links to the Internet that are appropriate sources for the story.	Poor Each story includes at least one link to another page of their own wiki following the basic instructions provided.
Images/Graphics	Excellent Includes images that are an important part of the wiki and add strong detail. Use of images contributes to the story meaning in significant ways. Images are linked to other wikis.	Fair Includes images/graphics that are closely linked to the story.	Poor Includes images/graphics from the Internet that are not closely linked to the story, or does not include any images or graphics.
Writing and Process	Excellent Wiki text shows relationships with other links and perspectives. The text and links flow and make sense to the reader. Wiki is completed but is also a text that will constantly change as a part of a bigger system.	Fair Wiki text uses student(s) voice and personal ideas and demonstrates strong relationships to other links. Wiki has been created through many revisions and changes.	Poor Wiki text uses student(s) voice and personal ideas. Wiki has been created in the time allowed and is close to a finished product.
Short Story
	Excellent (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Poor (N/A)
Content	Excellent The tone, voice, and content of the story are consistant and represent the author. The story meets all requirements: 1.5-2 pages long, includes the line "It was completely unexpected", has at least 2 characters, describes the setting setting, has a consistant point of view/narrator, and follows writing conventions.	Fair The tone, voice, and content of the story are some what consistant. The story meets all requirements: 1.5-2 pages long, includes the line "It was completely unexpected", has at least 2 characters, describes the setting setting, has a consistant point of view/narrator, and follows writing conventions.	Poor The story does not meet requirements. OR The story is absent.
Creativity/Connections	Excellent Makes unexpected but clear connections to others’ texts to extend the story in interesting and surprising directions.	Fair Uses links that connect to classmates’ wikis in ways that forward and develop that story. Classmates’ wikis become part of your wiki story.	Poor Makes basic connections/links within own text to create story that has more than one character that, in some way, connect together.
Editing & Comments
	Excellent (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Poor (N/A)
Edits to other's stories	Excellent Edits include writing conventions, contribute to the story by adding to characterization, plot, setting, OR dialogue. Edits are consistant with the original author's voice/tone, plot-line, and characterization.	Fair Edits include writing conventions AND contribute to the story by adding to characterization, plot, setting, OR dialogue.	Poor Edits are absent, merely replicate the work done by others, or focus solely on writing conventions.
Comments on other's stories	Excellent Comments provide meaningful feedback (ie ask clarifying questions, offer specific suggestions for changes to the story content, offer specific suggestions for new links or images) and offer interpretations or analysis of the story.	Fair Comments provide meaningful feedback (ie ask clarifying questions, offer specific suggestions for changes to the story content, offer specific suggestions for new links or images).	Poor Comments are absent. OR Comments provide no meaningful feedback.
Edits to own story	Excellent Edits address peer's comments and edits AND substantially add to the story.	Fair Edits address peer's comments and edits.	Poor Edits are absent, merely replicate the work done by others, or focus solely on writing conventions.
Comment on own story	Excellent Comment discusses the influence of writing and editing process on the final version of the story AND reflects on what the author has learned about wikis and writing.	Fair Comment discusses the influence of writing and editing process on the final version of the story.	Poor Comment is absent or is not reflective.

Keywords:

Wiki, creative writing, group work

Subjects:

English

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric