iRubric: Assessment Criteria for Role Play CO304 rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Assessment Criteria for Role Play CO304

Assessment Criteria for Role Play CO205

Rubric Code: M72927

By KatrinaTravers

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Humanities

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Component 40 %
	High Distinction 100-85% 0 pts	Distinction 84-75% 0 pts	Credit 74-65% 0 pts	Pass 64-50% (N/A)	Fail Below 50% (N/A)
Demonstrating the chosen approach 30%
5 % Remains within the boundaries of the goal of the session	High Distinction Evidence of ability to modify chosen approach to achieve the goal of session efficiently.	Distinction Evidence of ability to apply the chosen approach to acheive the goal of the session efficiently	Credit Evidence of ability to recognise the applicability of the chosen approach to acheive session goal, but with limited ability to apply or modify approach to specific situation.	Pass Evidence of effective demonstration of the chosen approach to acheive goal, but with no ability to modify it to the specific situation.	Fail No evidence of ability to stick to the goal of the session.
5 % Seeks clarity of the couples issues using an appropriate and relevant approach	High Distinction Evidence of ability to modify chosen approach to seek clarity in couples situation	Distinction Evidence of ability to apply the chosen approach to seek clarity in couples situaton.	Credit Evidence of ability to recognise the applicability of the chosen approach to seek clarity, but with limited ability to apply or modify the approach to get clarity succinctly.	Pass Evidence of effective demonstration of the chosen approach to seek clarity, but with no ability to apply or modify it to this specific situation.	Fail No evidence of ability to seek clarity
5 % The session presents at an identifiable stage within the couselling process and is executed effectively within the context of that stage	High Distinction Evidence of ability to modify chosen approach to suit the context of the stage of the counselling process	Distinction Evidence of ability to apply the chosen approach to suit the context of the stage of the counselling process	Credit Evidence of ability to recognise the applicability of the chosen approach to suit the context of the stage of the counsellign process, but with limited ability to apply or modify the approach to suit the context.	Pass Evidence of effective demonstration of the chosen approach to the context of the counselling process, but with no ability to apply or modify it to suit this specific context.	Fail No evidence of ability to apply chosen approach to the context.
5 % Demonstrates counselling micro-skills effectively in a way that is relevant to working with the couple in the context of the issues and stage in the process	High Distinction Evidence of ability to modify microskills to be most effective with the couple and the context.	Distinction Evidence of ability to apply microskills to be effective with the couple and the context.	Credit Evidence of ability to recognise needed microskills for the couple and context, but with limited ability to apply or modify microskills to this couple and context.	Pass Evidence of effective demonstration of microskills, but with no abilty to apply or modify it to suit couple or context.	Fail No evidence of effective microskills.
5 % Approaches the client/counsellor relationship in an appropriate and effective manner in relation to the couple and the issues being faced.	High Distinction Evidence of ability to modify meta-alliance to be most effective for couple and context.	Distinction Evidence of ability to apply self to meta-alliance to be effective for couple and context.	Credit Evidence of ability to recognise meta-alliance in couple context, but with limited ability to apply or modify self to meta-alliance.	Pass Evidence of being conscious of the meta-alliance.	Fail No evidence of meta-alliance consciousness.
5 % Maintains the counsellor role effectively with the couple in the context of the presenting issue	High Distinction Evidence of ability to modify role as counsellor to suit couple and context.	Distinction Evidence of ability to apply self to counsellor role in couple counselling context.	Credit Evidence of recognition of counsellor role in couple counselling context, but with limited ability to apply or modify role	Pass Evidence of knowledge of counsellor role in couple counselling context.	Fail No ability to maintain counsellor role in context of couple counselling.
Demonstrating the relevance of the chosen school of approach. 10%
5 % The approach chosen matches the issues being dealt with by the couple	High Distinction Evidence of ability to modify approach to match the issues of the couple.	Distinction Evidence of ability to apply approach to the issues of the couple.	Credit Evidence of recognition of needing to apply or modify approach to match the issues of the couple	Pass Evidence of knowledge of needed approach given the couples issues.	Fail No evidence of correct approach needed for issues presented.
5 % The approach chosen is congruent with the couples way of looking at and dealing with the issues	High Distinction Evidence of ability to modify approach to match the couples understanding of the issue(s).	Distinction Evidence of ability to apply approach to couples understanding of the issue(s)	Credit Evidence of recognition of needing to apply or modify approach to match the couples understanding of the issue(s)	Pass Evidence of knowledge of approach needed for the couples understanding of the issue(s)	Fail No evidence of knowledge of best approach needed for the couples understanding of the issue(s)

Subjects:

Humanities

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric