iRubric: Working Portfolio Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Working Portfolio Rubric

The purpose of this rubric is to assess students' working portfolios throughout the year.

Rubric Code: M357C4

By kimbau58

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: 9-12


	(N/A)	(N/A)	(N/A)	Good (N/A)	Excellent (N/A)
Section 1
	Unacceptable 5 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 15 pts	Good 20 pts	Excellent 25 pts
Homework	Unacceptable Homework assignments show little effort,assignments are incomplete. Or Only one assignment has been completed to the best of the student's ability.	Poor Both homework assignments are not completed to the best of students' ability, or are incomplete. Or student does not show understanding of the concept.	Fair One homework assignment has been completed to the best of the students' ability, the other is only half complete. Or, both are complete, but student does not show understanding of the concepts.	Good Homework assignments are completed, and student shows understanding of the concept, but has not yet mastered it.	Excellent Homework assignments are completed to the best of the student's ability. Student has mastered the concept, making few to no errors.
Section 2
	Unacceptable 5 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 15 pts	Good 20 pts	Excellent 25 pts
Journal	Unacceptable Student responds to the topic assignment but the response clearly shows that the student does not care about the topic or understanding the topic. No metacognition is shown and the response is not written in academic English.	Poor Student doesn't develop an understanding of the reflective topic assigned. Journal responses are disorganized, shows no attempt at metacognition, but rambles about the topic. Response is not written using academic English.	Fair Student doesn't develop an understanding of the reflective topic assigned. Journal responses are disorganized	Good Student shows a developed understanding of the reflective topic assigned. Journal responses are organized, show basic metacognition and are written to the best of the student's ability.	Excellent Student shows a developed understanding of the reflective topic assigned. Journal responses are well thought out. show metacognition and written to the best of the student's ability.
Section 3
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 10 pts	Acceptable 15 pts	Good 20 pts	Excellent 25 pts
In-class Assignments	Poor Student has only submitted 1/few assignment done to the best of his/her ability. This assignment shows the student understands the concepts assessed.	Fair Half of the in-class assignments are completed to the best of student's ability and show understanding of the concept. Or the assignments show the student does not understand the concept.	Acceptable Student does not show understanding of the concepts in any of the assignments, or 2 of 3 assignments are complete but not to the best of the student's ability.	Good All in-class assignments are completed to the best of student's ability. The work shows that the student understands the concept but has not yet mastered it.	Excellent All in-class assignments are completed to the best of student's ability. The work shows that the student has mastered the concept.
Section 4
	Unacceptable 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 15 pts	Good 20 pts	Excellent 25 pts
Organizatiion	Unacceptable Student did not submit a portfolio. Student turned in a stack of papers with no organizational structure.	Poor Student's papers are thrown into the working portfolio with no organization. Important handouts are missing.	Fair Student's working portfolio is not neat, but the work is in the right section. Student is missing important handouts	Good Student's working portfolio is neat, shows pride in students' work, but is missing forms in certain places.	Excellent Student's working portfolio is neat, organized and shows pride in students' work.

Subjects:

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric