Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Student's portfolio TESFL rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Student's portfolio TESFL
Rubric Code:
M2468W7
By
teachersalas
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
ePortfolio
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
e-portfolio
Excellent
4 pts
Proficient
4 pts
Basic
4 pts
Limited
4 pts
Organization
Excellent
The e-portfolio is exceptionally well-organized with clear sections, logical flow, and easy navigation. The arrangement enhances the overall coherence and accessibility of the content.
Proficient
The e-portfolio is well-organized with clearly defined sections and a logical flow. Navigation is user-friendly, contributing to the overall coherence of the content.
Basic
The organization of the e-portfolio is acceptable, but improvements could be made for better clarity and flow. Some sections may lack coherence.
Limited
The e-portfolio lacks effective organization, making it challenging for the audience to follow. Sections are disorganized or unclear.
Content Integration
Excellent
The e-portfolio effectively integrates the essay, the mind map, the presentation, the lesson plan, and the teacher's philosophy. Connections between different components demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the course content.
Proficient
Components are well-integrated, showcasing a solid understanding of the course material. Connections between essay, mind map, presentation, lesson plan, and teacher's philosophy are evident.
Basic
Integration is adequate, but some components may feel disconnected or lack a clear relationship. The overall understanding of course content is apparent but may require refinement.
Limited
Components are loosely integrated or appear unrelated. The overall understanding of the course content is limited or unclear.
Completeness of Activities Design
Excellent
The e-portfolio demonstrates an exceptional level of completeness by designing each activity, including the essay, mind map, presentation, lesson plan, and teacher's philosophy. All required elements are not only included but are meticulously developed, reflecting a high level of engagement and effort.
Proficient
The e-portfolio demonstrates an exceptional level of completeness by designing each activity, including the essay, mind map, presentation, lesson plan, and teacher's philosophy. All required elements are not only included but are meticulously developed, reflecting a high level of engagement and effort. The completeness of activities design is acceptable, but one of the elements is missing or may lack carefulness or attention to detail.
Basic
The e-portfolio demonstrates an exceptional level of completeness by thoroughly designing each activity, including the essay, mind map, presentation, lesson plan, and teacher's philosophy. Minor refinements are needed. The activities are incomplete or lack detailed design, reflecting a limited effort in completing the required tasks. Not all required elements are included.
Limited
The activities are incomplete or lack detailed design, reflecting a limited effort in completing the required tasks. Not all required elements are included.
Reflection and Insight
Excellent
Reflections on the readings, the essay, the mind map, and the presentation demonstrate insightful analysis and a deep understanding of the portfolio design process. The learner provides detailed insights and connections between theoretical concepts and practical applications.
Proficient
Reflections display a good level of analysis and understanding, offering thoughtful insights into the connections between theoretical concepts and practical applications.
Basic
Reflections are present but may lack depth or detailed analysis. Some insights into the connections between theory and practice are apparent.
Limited
Reflections are superficial, lacking in-depth analysis and thoughtful insights. Connections between theory and practice may be unclear.
Technical Proficiency
Excellent
The e-portfolio is technically proficient, free of errors, and utilizes the platform effectively. Hyperlinks, multimedia, and interactive elements enhance the overall user experience. (if it has links)
Proficient
Technical Proficiency The e-portfolio is technically proficient, free of errors, and utilizes the platform effectively. Hyperlinks, multimedia, and interactive elements enhance the overall user experience. The e-portfolio demonstrates technical proficiency with minimal errors. Hyperlinks and multimedia are used effectively, contributing to a positive user experience. Technical proficiency is acceptable, but some errors or issues with platform usage may be present.
Basic
Technical proficiency is acceptable, but some errors or issues with platform usage may be present. Hyperlinks and multimedia, if used, may need refinement.
Limited
Technical issues significantly impact the e-portfolio's presentation. Errors, lack of hyperlinks, or multimedia issues hinder user experience.
Overall Impression
Excellent
The e-portfolio leaves a lasting, positive impression, showcasing a mastery of portfolio design concepts and a deep understanding of the course content. The learner's creativity and commitment to excellence are evident. The overall impression is satisfactory, with room for improvement. The e-portfolio demonstrates an acceptable understanding of portfolio design concepts and course content.
Proficient
The e-portfolio creates a positive impression, indicating a strong grasp of portfolio design concepts and a good understanding of the course content. The learner's efforts are commendable.
Basic
The overall impression is satisfactory, with room for improvement. The e-portfolio demonstrates an acceptable understanding of portfolio design concepts and course content. It needs to demonstrate more effort to show content satisfactory.
Limited
The overall impression is limited, reflecting challenges in grasping portfolio design concepts and a limited understanding of the course content
Subjects:
Foreign Languages
Types:
ePortfolio
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Foreign Languages rubrics
More ePortfolio rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.