Skip to main content
iRubric: EIU 4102G Final Exam Presentation rubric

iRubric: EIU 4102G Final Exam Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
EIU 4102G Final Exam Presentation 
Rubric Code: M24262B
By gailt182
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Exam  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Primary Trait Analysis for Speaking Matrix
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Organization

Poor

Had little or no focus on central idea or topic; no apparent logical structure. Introduction or body or conclusion absent; lacked transitions.
Fair

Attempted to focus on an idea or topic; ideas were loosely connected to topic; structure unclear; introduction, body, conclusion detectable but not comprehensive; transitions unclear.
Good

Conveyed a central idea or topic; most information presented in logical structure; adequate introduction, body, conclusion; adequate transitions.
Excellent

Arrangement of ideas clearly related to topic; well organized with introduction, body, conclusion; good transitions; introduction includes an attention getter; statement of thesis included with credibility of information. Conclusion includes summary and closure.
Language

Poor

Inadequate standards of usage; no varied sentence structure and word choice; unfamiliar terms not defined.
Fair

Unfamiliar terms not easily interpreted. Little varied sentence structure and word choice; minimal evidence of appropriate standards of usage.
Good

Used some varied sentence structure and word choice; unfamiliar terms are easily interpreted; adequate standards of usage employed.
Excellent

Appropriate standards of usage of situation and audience; consistently used varied sentence structure and word choice; evidence of precise and vivid language; unfamiliar terms defined.
Material

Poor

Content not specific, credible, relevant, sufficient, interesting. No support. No resources cited. Lacks audience adaptation of content.
Fair

Content minimally specific, credible, relevant, sufficient, interesting. Minimal support. Few resources cited. Little audience adaptation of content.
Good

Content adequately specific, credible, relevant, sufficient, interesting. Lacked support for some points. Partial audience adaptation of content. Some recourses cited.
Excellent

Content highly specific, credible, relevant, sufficient, interesting; evidence supported topic; connection between support and main points is clear. Content is appropriate for situation and audience; Information resources accurately cited.
Analysis

Poor

Limited adaptation to audience and situation; approach and structure not appropriate for the overall purpose; lacks evidence of critical thinking.
Fair

Inconsistent adaptation to audience and situation. Approach and structure inconsistent with overall purpose. Inconsistent evidence of critical thinking.
Good

Some evidence of adaptation to the audience and situation. Approach and structure consistent with overall purpose. Evidence of critical thinking.
Excellent

Presentation clearly adapted to the audience and situation. Approach and structure highly consistent with overall purpose. Strong evidence of critical thinking.
Non-Verbal Delivery

Poor

Read straight from the notes and or audio/visual materials. Exhibited little to no audience awareness, gestures, eye contact, Frequent distracting mannerisms.
Fair

Relied heavily on notes and or audio/visual materials. Exhibited minimal awareness to audience using infrequent gestures and eye contact. Some distracting mannerisms.
Good

Referred occasionally to notes and or audio/visual materials. Engaged audience through gestures and eye contact. Aware of audience reaction.
Excellent

Did not read from notes and or audio/visual materials. Clearly engaged in the audience through consistent use of gestures and eye contact. Responsive to audience reaction.
Verbal Delivery

Poor

No variation in pitch, volume, rate, or emphasis. Fillers (ah, uhm, ers) distracts from the presentation. Lack of clear articulation and pronunciation.
Fair

Limited variation in pitch, volume, rate, or emphasis. Some fillers (ah, uhm, ers) distracts from the presentation. Minimally effective clear articulation and pronunciation.
Good

Some variation in pitch, volume, rate, or emphasis. Few fillers (ah, uhm, ers) distracts from the presentation. Effective articulation and pronunciation.
Excellent

Voice variation in pitch, volume, rate, or emphasis. Free of fillers (ah, uhm, ers) distracts from the presentation. Highly effective articulation and pronunciation.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16