iRubric: Web Page Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Web Page Rubric

Evaluation of website that could be used in teaching

Rubric Code: M23W6C

By tmjubb

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Math

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Webpage Rubric
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Subject Appropriatness
Educational Relevance	Poor Desired Topics are not covered	Fair Desired Topics are scattered within the site	Good Desired Topics are covered.
*Current Information	Poor Information is not updated regularly. Information is more than 10 years old.	Fair Information is updated at least once a year. Information is not older than 5 years old.	Good Information is changed as research is changed and updated regularly. Information is not older than 3 years old
*Content	Poor The point of the website is not clear and information is hard to obtain.	Fair Some helpful information, but still not all you were looking for.	Good The most up to date information put in a clear concise manner that makes learning easier. Really adresses what you were looking for.
Classroom Environment Suitability	Poor Lack of external resources would have detrimental impact on the learning	Fair Some external resources are required to complete learning activities	Good All resources required are contained with the site
Peer Interaction Suitability	Poor No Peer Interraction possible	Fair Group work possible	Good Flexible Group work options available
Pedagogical Design
Open Pedagogical Design	Poor	Fair Tool type - processor, database	Good Tutee type - programming languages teaching the computer to do something
Closed Pedagogical Design	Poor Drill and Practice - reinforces material that has already been taught	Fair Tutorial - new information is presented and a check is put in place to see if the material is understood	Good Problem Solving - multiple rules applied in correct order
Potential Bias
Ethnic Bias	Poor Ethnic Bias is disctiminatory	Fair Ethnic Bias evident with some stereotyping	Good Ethnic Bias not evident
Gender Bias	Poor Gender Bias is disctiminatory	Fair Gender Bias evident with some stereotyping	Good Gender Bias not evident
Social Bias	Poor Social Bias is discriminatory	Fair Social Bias evident with some stereotyping	Good Social Bias not evident
Inclusive	Poor No Consideration evident for students outside of the mainstream	Fair Some Consideration for students outside of mainstream to be included - eg text as letters allows text to speech conversion, as opposed to bit maps that don't	Good Examples of Inclusive education readily found
Social Impact	Poor Generates unhealthy social impact discussion	Fair Does not generate social impact discussion	Good Generates healthy open social impact discussion
Fluffy Stuff
*Appearance	Poor Monochromatic color schemes. No pictures. No clip art. Nothing to grab your attention.	Fair A few graphics and some color to make you want to look around.	Good Extensive pictures, graphics, and clip art to grab your attention and make you want to check out more on the site.
*User-Friendly	Poor Hard to move around website. Don't know what to do. Clicks take you to places you don't want to go. No links to other helpful information	Fair A few links to helpful information. Directions are easier to understand.	Good Every link is current and useful. Directions are very easy to understand. Several links to more information.
Feedback
When Users get things right	Poor No Feedback	Fair Too much feedback	Good Feedback fades
When Users get things wrong	Poor Feedback responce is rewarding	Fair Not enough feedback	Good Feedback is instructional

Keywords:

Bias, Pedagogical Design, Feedback,

Subjects:

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric