- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Hydraulic Machine Project rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Hydraulic Machine Project Science hydraulic arm Project Working in teams, the students are going to build a hydraulic machine that effectively accomplishes a task. Rubric Code: LXCWA5W By brycegrant Draft Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Group Hydraulic Machine Project Enter rubric description
	Not completed 0 pts	Poor 4 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Effectiveness Mechanical ARm Machine must perform a task of the group's choosing	Not completed Project not completed	Poor The machine was not able to move at all	Fair The machine could move, but was not able to accomplish the desired task.	Good The machine could effectively move. task was accomplished with minor complications.	Excellent The machine could move with ease and accomplished the desired task with efficiency.
Detail/ Complexity This refers to the complexity in the design and the use of syringes to create a useful machine.	Not completed The project was not completed or did not use hydraulics.	Poor Machine was made with no complexity or detail in design.	Fair There is some detail and complexity to the machine, but could improved through proper engineering.	Good There is complexity to the machine, but may have minor engineering flaws.	Excellent The machine is very complex and well engineered using the given materials.
Hydraulic Packet Hydraulic Packet	Not completed no presentation was made.	Poor The hydraulic packet was very poorly done and it was completed late	Fair It was completed on time, but was poorly done and was not thorough, or it did not show how machine was built, or did not have effective drawings.	Good The hydraulic packet was well done, but was either not neat or did not show where the mechanical advantage is in the machine.	Excellent The hydraulic packet was well done and it showed where the mechanical advantage is in machine.
Group effectiveness How effectively did the group work together. This criterion will be conglomeration of the reports and direct observation.	Not completed The group did not work together well at all or did not stay on task.	Poor The group was observed failing to work together for the majority of the assigned time in class. Or their scores were low every day.	Fair The group worked for about half time.	Good The group stayed on task for the majority of the week, but it took urging from the leader and the teacher.	Excellent The group stayed on task for the majority of the assigned week with minimal urging from the leader