Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Engneering Notebook Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Engneering Notebook Rubric
Engineering Notebook - PLTW IED
A rubric for assessing the student's engineering notebook
Rubric Code:
LXC8W83
By
ArohiV
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
PLTW Engineering Notebook
Excellent
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Needs Improvement
2 pts
Table of Contents
Excellent
Table of contents accurately represents all of the entries in the notebook. Page numbers, titles, and dates are listed for each entry.
Good
Table of contents represents most of the entries in the notebook. Page numbers, titles, and dates are occasionally missing. Entries are fairly neat and legible.
Fair
able of contents has only occasional entries. Page numbers and/or dates are missing. Entries are barely legible.
Needs Improvement
No Table of contents exists/No entries in the Table of contents
Page Titles/Objective
Excellent
Page titles are accurately displayed at the top of each page.
Titles clearly identify content of each page.
Objective clearly written and dated.
Entries are neat and legible.
Good
Page titles are displayed at the top of each page, but are occasionally missing/inaccurate.
Objective fairly clear and dated, however it could use more detail.
Entries are fairly neat and legible.
Fair
An attempt at page titles is present but inaccurate. Frequent omissions occur.
Objective is weak and missing most of the details.
Dates may be missing.
Entries are barely legible.
Needs Improvement
Page titles are missing.
Objective is missing.
Not dated.
Notebook Entries
Excellent
All entries are consistently done in permanent blue or black ink.
All entries, figures and calculation are labeled clearly and consistently.
Labels and diagram titles are PRINTED and dated.
Good
Most entries are done in blue or black permanent ink.
Most entries, figures, and calculations are labeled. Labels and diagram titles are PRINTED and dated. Occasional errors are evident
Fair
Entries are frequently done in pencil and only occasionally done in permanent ink.
An attempt at labeling entries, figures and calculations is evident. Dates are inconsistently listed at the beginning of entries, if at all
Needs Improvement
Entries are always done in pencil.
No attempt is evident at dating entries and diagram titles.
Added Items
Excellent
Items added to the notebook are permanently affixed to a page. Signature or initials are written in ink over the edge of the item.
Good
Items added to the notebook are permanently affixed to a page. Signature or initials are missing over the edge of the item.
Fair
Items added to the notebook are permanently affixed, but are done sloppily and with little care.
Needs Improvement
Items are not permanently affixed to the notebook. OR
Items are done sloppily.
Mistakes/Unused Space
Excellent
Mistakes and errors are consistently lined out, initialed and corrected. Unused space is consistently X'd or lined out and a signature is present.
Good
Mistakes and errors are lined out, initialed and corrected. Unused space is X'd or lined out and a signature is present. Occasional errors of omission are present.
Fair
Mistakes and errors are inconsistently or improperly lined out, initialed and corrected. Unused space is occasionally X'd or lined out and a signature is sometimes present. Errors of omission are frequent.
Needs Improvement
Clear evidence exists where items have been erased or scribbled out. Unused space is evident without being X'd or lined out.
Pages signed, dated and witnessed
Excellent
Pages are consistently signed and dated by the designer. Witness signatures and dates are also consistently displayed. No errors are evident.
Good
Pages are signed and dated by the designer and witness. Occasionally errors of omission by the designer or witness are present.
Fair
Some evidence exists that signatures have been attempted by both the designer and witness' Frequent lapses and errors of omission are present.
Needs Improvement
No evidence is present that either the designer or a witness has signed and dated pages.
Content
Engineering Process
Excellent
Shows a clear understanding of where the project is in the engineering process: Question - Design - Build - Test - Redesign - Test, etc. Supported by notes, data and summaries.
Good
Shows some understanding of where the project is in the engineering process, may not show full testing, but some exists or is vague (It is great, it didn't work, etc) Supported by notes, data and summaries.
Fair
Engineering process is referenced, but not supported completely by notes, summaries, or data
Needs Improvement
Engineering process is not clearly followed. Or the notebook is a simple log of daily activities without connection or process.
Daily Tasks
Excellent
Tasks are listed for each day and are achievable and specific
Good
Tasks are listed for each day and are specific
Fair
Tasks are listed for each day, but may be somewhat vague
Needs Improvement
Tasks are vague, overly simple, or missing
Notes
Excellent
Notes paint a clear picture of how the class period was used and matches the tasks and summary. Aligns with the data listed
Good
Notes paint a clear picture of how the class period was used, linked to the tasks and summary or to the data
Fair
Notes give a general view of how the day was used. May not clearly connect to the daily tasks, summary or data specifically.
Needs Improvement
Notes are vague, overly simple, or missing
Design/Sketches
Excellent
All sketches and pictures are complete and clearly labeled with descriptions.
Good
Sketches are complete but inconsistently or not clearly labeled.
Fair
Sketches have drawings however incomplete information like Heading information and important identification of components and/or description is incomplete or inaccurate.
Needs Improvement
Sketches are missing or not complete.
Grading
Grade
Excellent
Good
Fair
Needs Improvement
Keywords:
engineering notebook
Subjects:
Engineering
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.