Skip to main content

iRubric: Sports Desker/Anchor rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Sports Desker/Anchor 
Sports Desker/Anchor
Rubric Code: LX3C47X
By BCITRadio
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Journalism  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Sports Desker/Anchor
  Poor

0 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Lead Lines
20 %

Poor

Each lead line doesn't relate to its story's main facts. Lead lines contain inaccurate information and/or are long-winded. Lead lines do not grab the listener's attention.
Fair

Most lead lines don't relate to the story's main facts. Some lead lines contain inaccurate information and/or are long-winded.
Lead lines somewhat grab the listener's attention.
Good

Most lead lines do relate to the story's main facts.
Lead lines provide accurate information succinctly.
Lead lines grab the listener's attention.
Excellent

All lead lines relate to the story's main facts.
Each lead line provides accurate information and succinct concepts.
Each lead line fully engages the listener's attention.
Line-Up
25 %

Poor

Line-up lacks any organizational structure is not relevant to target audience.
Story order does not follow the seven news determinants.
No stories rewritten from one sportscast to another.
Contains factual errors.
Fair

Line-up is disjointed and somewhat relevant to target audience.
Lead story correctly placed based on the seven news determinants, but stories afterwards are not.
Few stories are rewritten from one sportscast to another.
Contains a few factual errors.
Good

Line-up is correct and relevant to target audience.
Story order correctly based on the seven news determinants.
Most stories rewritten from one sportscast to another.
Contains minimal factual errors.
Excellent

Line-up is highly engaging to the listener, correct and effective.
Story order correctly based on the seven news determinants and is developed in a creative and entertaining way.
All stories rewritten from one sportscast to another.
Contains no factual errors.
Actualities
15 %

Poor

Sportscast contains no actualities.
Actualities are longer than 20 seconds.
Actuality levels are too high or too low and/or distorted.
Actualities are not attributed to the person speaking.
Actualities gleaned from outside sources (TSN, Sportsnet, team websites) are not credited to those sources.
Voice over of highlight package is used as an actuality.
Fair

Sportscast contains only one actuality.
Most actualities are longer than 20 seconds.
Most actuality levels are too high or too low and/or distorted.
Most actualities are not properly attributed to the person speaking.
Most actualities gleaned from outside sources (TSN, Sportsnet, team or league websites) are not credited to those sources.
Good

Sportscast contains two actualities.
Actualities are shorter than 20 seconds.
Some actuality levels are too high or too low and/or distorted.
Some actualities are properly attributed to the person speaking.
Some actualities gleaned from outside sources (TSN, Sportsnet, team or league websites) are credited to those sources.
Excellent

Sportscast contains more than two actualities.
Actualities are shorter than 20 seconds, properly balanced, and used in a creative manner.
Actuality levels are appropriate.
All actualities are properly attributed to the person speaking.
All actualities gleaned from outside sources (TSN, Sportsnet, team or league websites) are credited to those sources.
Accuracy and Detail
15 %

Poor

Errors in accuracy make stories difficult to comprehend.
The facts are incorrect, wrong, or undeveloped.
The facts may be confusing or inappropriate for the stories and sportscast.
Fair

Stories attempt to develop the facts, but are not clearly described.
Errors in accuracy cause some confusion.
Facts are buried toward the end of each story or stories are missing important facts altogether.
Good

Stories clearly and accurately develop facts.
Information is clearly described in each story.
Excellent

Stories contain unusual and interesting detail.
Important facts are highlighted in each story.
Stories are developed in a way that shows skill and mastery beyond expectations.
Presentation
15 %

Poor

Performance is not professional.
There are numerous errors in broadcast.
Fair

Performance attempts professionalism, but comes across as immature or monotone.
Good

Performance is professional and complete.
Excellent

Performance is professional and creative.
Skill and mastery of performance concepts are beyond expectations.
Editing
10 %

Poor

There are major errors in editing and mechanics.
Production and script are poor.
No scripts provided for critique.
Fair

There are some errors in editing and mechanics.
Production and script are adequate.
Good

Minimal errors in editing and mechanics.
Production and script are complete and show creativity.
Excellent

No errors in editing or mechanics.
Production and script are complete and developed in a way that exceeds expectations.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243