iRubric: Case Study CE PTA 212 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Case Study CE PTA 212

4-5 pages, double-spaced, HIPAA-compliant in paragraph form. It is acceptable to have data in the form of a chart or table.

Rubric Code: LB926C

By laurasage

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Case Study
	Poor (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Very Good (N/A)
Length 5 pts It is important to pick a topic that can be addressed in this number of pages. More is not better!	Poor 3 pages or less. Includes use of excel spreadsheet type data. (not including references) 0 points	Fair <4 full pages 3 points	Good >5.5 pages 4 points	Very Good EXACTLY 4-5 pages (not including references) 5 points
Appropriateness of research article 15 pts High Level research from peer-reviewed sources, integrated into decision making	Poor Non peer reviewed article (i.e. text book, general interest publication, company-sponsored research expert opinion such as a CI interview) 5 points	Fair Research article(s) from a peer-reviewed journal that are any of the following: older than 2010, not pertinent to your patient, or not submitted with case study 8 points	Good Multiple research articles from peer-reviewed journals published after 2010, pertinent to your patient, submitted with case study, but minimal discussion of study limitation or how they influenced clinical decision-making 12 points	Very Good Multiple research articles from peer-reviewed journals, (published after 2010) pertinent to your patient, submitted with case study. Evidence of how articles influenced your clinical decision-making. Include at least one limitation of the study. 15 points
Organization 15 pts Logical flow of infomation and clinical thought process	Poor Disorganized & contains unnecessary info(repeated or too many details). Requires re-reading to follow thought process. May raise more questions than it answers 5 points	Fair	Good Information regarding your thought process is present, but may not be clear. This may reflect only partial understanding of the big picture or the pt's situation 11 points	Very Good Clearly organized sections (i.e. intro, patient information, brief summary of pt's problem, brief clear summary of how the research relates to your pt's situation) 15 points
Typos and grammatical errors 10 pts Any errors of spelling, key stroke or grammar	Poor >5 errors, or ANY first-person language (Any use of "I" "we", "my") 2 points	Fair 3-5 errors, written in professional, third-person language 5 points	Good 1-3 errors, written in professional, third-person language 8 points	Very Good No typos or grammatical errors, written in professional, third-person voice 10 points
On time 5 pts	Poor >12 hours late: 0 points	Fair	Good <12 hours: 3 points	Very Good By deadline: 5 points
HIPAA compliant 5 pts	Poor Full name used anywhere in the paper, email (i.e. subject line) 0 points	Fair First name only used 2 points	Good Fake or silly name used 4 points	Very Good No name or only initials used 5 points
Past Medical History & demographics 10 pts medical & surgical history, age, job and/or activity information, and patient's chief complaint	Poor Vague or incomplete information that may conflict with other parts of the paper. No information on pt's prior level of activity 0 points	Fair Partial or vague history and minimial info regarding activity 4 points	Good Rambling or excessive information (or not pertinent to pt's current condition) in addition to PMH & surgical history 7 points	Very Good Thorough (and concise) medical & surgical history. If this is pt's first illness or injury, clearly state this. Thorough info on pt's prior activity level 10 points
Phase of healing Medical and PT dx 10 pts What phase of healing is the patient in? Include ICD-10 codes	Poor Missing three of the following: medical diagnosis PT diagnosis ICD-10 code phase of healing 2 points	Fair Missing two of the following: medical diagnosis PT diagnosis ICD-10 code phase of healing 5 points	Good Missing one of the follow: medical diagnosis PT diagnosis ICD-10 code phase of healing 8 points	Very Good Medical diagnosis PT diagnosis (ICD- 10 code for each) phase of healing 10 points
PT goals and outcome measures 15 pts	Poor Goals listed in vague terms, or no functional outcome measures. No meaningful discussion in body of paper 3 points	Fair Minimal list of goals, or not in measurable terms, some discussion in paper No outcome measures 6 points	Good Less than 4 short &/or long term goals, in objective, measureable terms, or minimal discussion. Partial outcome measure info (initial but no follow up data) 10 points	Very Good Total of 4 short &/or long term goals, in objective, measurable terms. Includes use of functional outcome measures (i.e. TUG, 6MWT, Berg Balance, etc) . Both are discussed, not just listed 15 points
Interventions 10 pts	Poor no CPT codes listed, no parameters or progressions 0 points	Fair Missing two of the following: CPT codes all parameters Discussion of progression 4 points	Good Some CPT codes , some but not all parameters minimal discussion of progression 7 points	Very Good CPT code for each intervention, with parameters and evidence of progression of exercises 10 points

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric