iRubric: Weekly Check Ins and Discussions Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Weekly Check Ins and Discussions Rubric

Class Online Discussion Rubric

Blackboard application

Rubric Code: L8WAW2

By rttu2012

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Discussions Rubric
	5 Exceeds Expectations 5 pts	4 Meets Expectations 4 pts	2 Below Expectations or Marginal 2 pts
Quality of Comments 1 pts	5 Posts timely and appropriate comments, thoughtful and reflective, responds respectfully to other student's remarks, provokes questions and comments from the group	4 Posts timely comments, most are appropriate and reflect some thoughtfulness, leads to other questions or remarks from student and/or others	2 Posts are past due, comments lack depth, and may or may not lead to other questions from students
Internship Reflections 3 pts	5 Displays excellent understanding of the Critical Success Factors (CFSs) being discussed from internship observations and connects the CFSs to the TExES Principal Test/ Domain III or reference points from previous readings and discussions	4 Displays some understanding of the Critical Success Factors (CFSs) being discussed from internship observations and somewhat connects the CFSs to the TExES Principal Test/ Domain III or reference points from previous readings and discussions	2 Displays little understanding of the Critical Success Factors (CFSs) being discussed from internship observations and incoherently attempts connections s the CFSs to the TExES Principal Test/ Domain III or reference points from previous readings and discussions
Extends Others' Posts 1 pts	5 Displays an excellent understanding of the comments posted by others, by affirming and citing relevant research or asking a new related question or, making an oppositional statement supported by personal experience or related experience.	4 Displays some understanding of the comments posted by others, by affirming and citing some research or asking a somewhat related question or, making an oppositional statement somewhat supported by personal experience or related experience.	2 Displays little understanding of the comments posted by others, by affirming and citing no research or not asking a new related question or, making an oppositional statement somewhat supported by personal experience or related experience.